 This forum is hosted for free by Boardhost. Create your own free forum!
 This forum is hosted for free by Boardhost. Create your own free forum!
 Offline
Offline

 Offline
Offline

Yea, if only every person recreating in every bar, restaurant, movie theater, University, Grade school, and night club in the United States was armed with an AR-15, every night of every year.
That's the kind of country I want.
Paradise!
What could possibly go wrong?
Last edited by Goose (6/19/2016 12:23 pm)
 Offline
Offline
No don't need everyone. Just a few who want to be able to defend themselves or others who are in great danger. You must be in a very rough neighborhood if you want to lug around a rifle.
 
 Thread Starter
Thread Starter Offline
Offline

In a situation like Pulse, and with several people armed, how does one decide which shooter to shoot?
 Offline
Offline

Common Sense wrote:
No don't need everyone. Just a few who want to be able to defend themselves or others who are in great danger. You must be in a very rough neighborhood if you want to lug around a rifle.
Like at the pulse? Or in Newtown, CT?
I think we have to give up on these Rambo fantasies if we are ever to deal with the issue.
BTW, it's not very hard to get a gun in Florida.
Yet this still happened.
Whatever happened to more guns making us safer?
 Offline
Offline

Holy cow. CS's idea is so looney that the NRA disagrees.
 Offline
Offline

The actual sentiment behind the limited number of poster that went up seems to go like this "gays cannot protect themselves if the government is going to disarm individuals". This is all a bunch of hooey. The things on the table to help control guns has nothing to do with disarming the public from defending themselves.
Additionally, IMHO I would  venture to guess that most people don't even want to have to worry about carrying a gun into such public venues to begin with which would be considered soft targets.