Offline
The money
powering the NRA
From a small-town pharmacist to a commercial pilot, it's not just gunmakers that are funding the National Rifle Association’s political battles.The organization's overall revenue, which includes membership dues, program fees and other contributions, has boomed in recent years – rising to nearly $350 million in 2013.
The majority of this money funds NRA initiatives like member newsletters, sporting events and gun safety education and training programs.These help the NRA recruit new members and spread its pro-gun message. But to influence laws and keep its chosen leaders in power, it has a separate pool of money to use.
A CNNMoney analysis of federal campaign finance records shows that much of this money comes from everyday Americans. And these contributions, which the NRA uses to keep pro-gun lawmakers in office, are on the rise.Some political funding comes from big corporations, many within the gun industry, which donate millions to the NRA. But companies are barred from donating to the NRA’s political action committee, which the agency uses to fill campaign coffers, run ads and send out mailers for and against candidates.That’s where individual donations come in.
Since 2005, the NRA Political Victory Fund has received nearly $85 million in contributions from individual donors. After the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting, donations to this political action committee surged as gun owners worried that their rights to buy and own guns were at risk.The call for stricter gun control laws from leaders like President Obama in the wake of this tragedy fueled these fears and prompted the NRA to rally its members to fight against new regulations.As a result, gun sales soared, and so did donations.
Donations in the 2014 election cycle were up by more than 50% compared to the prior two years, and nearly doubled from a decade ago."Americans look to the NRA to defend their constitutional right to self protection," NRA spokesperson Jennifer Baker told CNNMoney. "When gun control advocates ramp up their efforts to pass gun control people voice their opposition by donating to the NRA."Contributions came from nearly 30,000 donors, with around 90% of donations made by people who gave less than $200 in a single year. According to the NRA, the average donation is around $35.The NRA's ability to raise so much money from small donations is highly unusual for a special interest group, demonstrating its wide reaching support, said Sarah Bryner, research director at the Center for Responsive Politics.
Only one person has donated even close to the maximum amount allowed by federal law, which is $5,000 per year: a computer programmer from Houston. Since 2005, he has donated $50,050 -- just shy of the $55,000 allowed for the 11-year period (including this year)."It is a good percentage of my income [5% to 10%], but I want to do everything I can easily do to preserve my freedoms," said the donor, who requested to remain anonymous. "I hope the money will be used to help conservative or libertarian minded candidates win elections."He said he worries that gun control advocates are trying to prevent the average citizen from owning guns at all.
He had previously donated to Republican candidates directly, but since he also wanted to support pro-gun Democrats, he has switched to donating almost exclusively to the NRA -- trusting it to distribute the money effectively."It is much easier to fight these bans now with money than to fight laws later with lawyers and evasion," he said. "I think having the average citizen armed is a powerful deterrent to would be abusers."Another top donor is an Air Force veteran from Texas who ranked as an expert with both the .38 revolver and the 9 millimeter pistol while he was on active duty.Currently he works as a commercial airline pilot, and he says he supports the NRA’s mission to stand up for the right of self defense. He says he has a concealed weapon permit and regularly carries a handgun."I'd like to see my contributions used to help elect solid gun rights supporters where possible, the most electable gun rights supporters where necessary, and the least objectionable candidate if that’s the best we can do," he said.And they're joined by an eclectic group of other top donors.
Last edited by Common Sense (12/06/2015 12:40 pm)
Offline
Re-located to the appropriate area.
Offline
Membership in the NRA is 5 million dues paying members if you believe the NRA, but the NRA does not publicize actual numbers. According to Pew Research, the number of members is somewhere in the neighborhood of 3 to 3.5 million dues paying members. Depending on whose figures you believe, that's 1.55% to .93% of the population of the U.S.
It's unfortunate that such a minuscule minority of people wield such legislative power in our federal government. You know . . . The one "of the people, by the people, and for the people" of this great nation. So the one concession that you have to make is that the NRA gets a pretty big BANG (pun intended) for their buck when it comes to influencing legislators concerning anything to do with gun control. Even though 74% of NRA members say they are in favor of such things as expanded background checks.
It's too bad that the leadership of this organization is as uncompromising as they historically have been concerning reasonable ways to stem the tide of gun related spree/mass shootings in this country. Their answer seems to be arm everyone everywhere for 'self protection' and wrap themselves in their sacrosanct interpretation of a single segment of an amendment. Anyone who dares to suggest anything akin to what they consider to be abridging their 'rights' (remember, they are, at best, 1.5% of the population) is berated as unamerican and in direct conflict to the non-specific tenets of the founding fathers.
Why can't we have a reasonable, enlightened, and productive discussion about how we might solve this problem without the one sided demagoguery of a very, very, very, small, albeit outspoken, portion of our society refusing to participate, or even listen?
Offline
Nice post, Ron. The NRA is in no way an organization with widespread membership or support.
Offline
Goose wrote:
Nice post, Ron. The NRA is in no way an organization with widespread membership or support.
True dat Goose . . . More people attended Bonnaroo music festival this year than attended the NRA's annual convention meeting.