Goose wrote:

The Man wrote:

Goose wrote:

That's two non sequitur's. 
YOU said that their deaths were no big deal because their lives don't matter and the  world is better off without them. That is what I am referring to, and you know it.
Please stay on topic

 
I'm on topic, as on topic as you are. I asked you a question. Your answer?

Answer me first.

 
I did answer you.

The Man wrote:

Goose wrote:

The Man wrote:

 
I'm on topic, as on topic as you are. I asked you a question. Your answer?

Answer me first.

 
I did answer you.

So, Trayvon martin's life doesn't matter?
It's OK that he died because he had it coming?
He's not one of the good ones, like MLK?

Yea, I stated that due process should be followed. And I still do.
I disagreed with the verdict in the Martin case. But, everything was done legally, so I must accept it.
I hope that the officers in the Gray case are aggessively prosecuted, while their rights are respected.
Clear enough?

Now, about you. Where did you get this peculiar idea that some people don't deserve those rights.
Don't dodge. You have written repeatedly that it is "ridiculous" for BLM to protest the deaths of Martin, Garner, and Gray, because they had it coming, and the world is a better place without them.
Gray was arrested for a minor offense. His death in police custody is a matter of great concern. You just can't have a guy die in custody, and say, Oh well, we did you a service. 
How do you reconcile that with our system of justice?

By the way, Due process is the legal requirement that the state must respect all legal rights that are owed to a person accused of a crime.

It does not preclude me from forming an opinion as to their guilt or innocence. These things are unrelated.

Goose wrote:

The Man wrote:

Goose wrote:

Yea, I stated that due process should be followed. And I still do.
I disagreed with the verdict in the Martin case. But, everything was done legally, so I must accept it.
I hope that the officers in the Gray case are aggessively prosecuted, while their rights are respected.
Clear enough?

Now, about you. Where did you get this peculiar idea that some people don't deserve those rights.
Don't dodge. You have written repeatedly that it is "ridiculous" for BLM to protest the deaths of Martin, Garner, and Gray, because they had it coming, and the world is a better place without them.
Gray was arrested for a minor offense. His death in police custody is a matter of great concern. You just can't have a guy die in custody, and say, Oh well, we did you a service. 
How do you reconcile that with our system of justice?

 
I'm not dodging anything. Freddie Gray?! Are you kidding me??? The guy had a felony rap sheet as thick as a Sears catalog. That guy lived the thug life through and through, and yes he did indeed have his fate coming to him.

So, he deserved to have his neck broken while being driven to the police station, shackled, cuffed, and presenting no danger to anyone?
Petty crimes deserve death?

 
Wait, I thought you were going to let due process play out until you assigned blame? No? ;)

Let's say he did have his neck broken, and he wasn't at fault.  No, he didn't deserve that, but yes, his thug lifestyle (proven, convicted thug lifestyle) led to it.  I'm sorry, I just don't have sympathy for that.  We just disagree on this, and that's fine.