Offline
Money well spent? I think not!
A public university spending half a million on a event?
But rest easy is was not “public money”? Well that is what
the school is saying!
Public university paid Clinton Foundation $500,000 to host event
Many people were shocked when they learned last year Hillary Clinton earned nearly $2 million in the span of 18 months giving speeches at colleges nationwide. Turns out there’s plenty more where that came from.
Arizona State University gave $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation for hosting a Clinton Global Initiative University event on the Tempe campus in 2014, The Arizona Republic reports.
Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton all headlined the three-day meeting, which encourages student attendees to pledge themselves to causes such as education, climate change, human rights, poverty, and public health, the initiative’s website states.“Student attendees had the opportunity to attend … working sessions and other special events covering topics across CGI U’s five focus areas and allowing them to network with their peers, build skills, and identify potential partnerships,” the initiative’s website states. “Youth organizations, topic experts, and celebrities joined students at the CGI U meeting to help them gain the skills and knowledge needed to take action.”
ASU spokesman Mark Johnson told The Arizona Republic in an e-mailed statement that the money used to pay for the event did not come from publicly funded coffers, but rather other parts of the university’s budget, such as tuition, private donations and grants.“[T]he university co-invested in this educational and promotional opportunity, which was co-produced for our students, and for students from around the world. No state funds were used for this purpose,” Johnson stated.
But Republican Sen. John McCain, who attended as a panelist, told The Arizona Republic that now that he knows how much the Clintons were paid, it wasn’t worth the price.
ASU paid Clinton Foundation $500K for event
Last edited by Common Sense (5/26/2015 2:49 pm)
Offline
Offline
Meh,,,,,,
Offline
Were any laws broken or is this just another thing you want to nit-pick about the Clintons?
Offline
Good question, Florentine.
I have an issue with phony indignation.
Is there a problem with earning money with public speaking?
Is that worse than making a fortune by trading derivatives or cuting a work force?
Am I supposed to feign outrage about Clinton's fortune and ignore Carly Fiorina's fortune?
Please, common, give me some advice!
Offline
Maybe if Clinton did something like:
Write a bunch of books like Killing Jesus
Or joined a worldwide consulting group like Carlyle
Or signed on as a talking head political contributor with Fox "news"
Or headed up a super PAC
Or painted portraits of cats and sold them
Maybe then some critics would think the money he made was more legitimate?
Offline
Yep, I just don't get the manufactured outrage