Offline
Please pay no mind to this posting if you are not concerned about the Clinton Foundation
receiving millions and millions of dollars while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.
Once again we find that they did not comply with ethics agreements.
Can you say conflict of interest? What about transparency?
And please do not say a thing about the secret e-mail servers in the Clinton basement!
You know everyone does it!
Clinton Foundation reveals up to $26 million in additional payments
Read the full story here:
The Clinton Foundation reported Thursday that it has received as much as $26.4 million in previously undisclosed payments from major corporations, universities, foreign sources and other groups.The disclosure came as the foundation faced questions over whether it fully complied with a 2008 ethics agreement to reveal its donors and whether any of its funding sources present conflicts of interest for Hillary Rodham Clinton as she begins her presidential campaign.
Last edited by Common Sense (5/22/2015 8:33 am)
Offline
That was pretty nasty.How about you discuss what you think about this without the snarky asides and the attempt at baiting.
Tell us what you think,,,,, or just go on to the next ten threads without any attempt at dialogue.
Offline
Common Sense wrote:
Please pay no mind to this posting if you are not concerned about the Clinton Foundation
Thanks. I won't.
Last edited by tennyson (5/22/2015 8:44 am)
Offline
Me neither.
I'm too busy worrying about what party Harvard professors donate to, and who is favored for president in the next poll of a couple hundred self identified "millionaires".
Last edited by Goose (5/22/2015 8:47 am)
Offline
I'm too worried about what the Bush Foundation has been up to while everyone's attention is on Clinton's charity.
Offline
Well, that does it! Commonsense and I are supporting and contributing to the Bernie Sanders campaign.
Offline
I told Bill he should register CGI as a 501C3 or C4 SuperPAC so he wouldn't have to disclose anything about donors.
Isn't it a little strange, in this country, that all this scrutiny is aimed at a charitable global initiative whereas political contributions in the hundreds of millions of dollars for the benefit of political parties and preferred candidates to influence national and regional U.S. elections are shrugged off with the tacit approval of a Supreme Court decision?
Offline
Rongone wrote:
I told Bill he should register CGI as a 501C3 or C4 SuperPAC so he wouldn't have to disclose anything about donors.
Isn't it a little strange, in this country, that all this scrutiny is aimed at a charitable global initiative whereas political contributions in the hundreds of millions of dollars for the benefit of political parties and preferred candidates to influence national and regional U.S. elections are shrugged off with the tacit approval of a Supreme Court decision?
It's our resident Hillary hater's obsession.
Offline
It's our resident Hillary hater's obsession.
It might be more than that .......... the dislike may extend to any Democrat, Progressive, or Independent. Maybe Common will respond.
Offline
Just Fred wrote:
It's our resident Hillary hater's obsession.
It might be more than that .......... the dislike may extend to any Democrat, Progressive, or Independent. Maybe Common will respond.
Maybe. He doesn't seem much interested in polite dialogue.