Offline
I think I fixed it.
I am not from a generation that has this all figured out.
Offline
Brady Bunch wrote:
Where did the original post go from Common Sense?
I didn't necessarily agree with it, but there wasn't anything in there that needed removed.
That is just really odd? "There was not anything in there that needed removed"?
So do you remove stuff from postings?
I think that is called Censorship?
Offline
Common Sense wrote:
Brady Bunch wrote:
Where did the original post go from Common Sense?
I didn't necessarily agree with it, but there wasn't anything in there that needed removed.That is just really odd? "There was not anything in there that needed removed"?
So do you remove stuff from postings?
I think that is called Censorship?
It was a mistake. And, if you look at the beginning of the thread, when Brady brought it to my attention, it was corrected immediately.
Lets not go off the deep end.
BTW, haven't you exceeded your allotment of question marks?
Offline
Common, you started this thread on the absence of fathers.
Well, Tennyson asked: "Let's say for argument that the premise is true (absent dads) .... how is it fixed ? "
Would you like to offer some ideas?