The New Exchange

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



4/29/2017 11:58 am  #1


First 100 days

Well, now that the mark has been hit, what do you think ??

Trump initially proclaimed all he would do in his first 100 days on the campaign trail, but more recently because of lack of substantial progress has kind of poo-pooed the importance of the date . Not a big surprise. 

Like most POTUS  he will take credit for any and all good and pass off inadequacies and failures. 

As far as successes (whether they be attributable to Trump or not), one would have to conclude that the biggest claims would have to be with 1) his Supreme Court nominee and 2) the market performance. The Supreme Court nomination would have happened with or without him likely and the market performance is at this point mostly based upon speculation both about his policies as well as international activities. 

There is still a LOT on his "promise list" to fulfill IF he wants to be successful. The highest SHOULD be jobs and the economy. The downer for many likely is that he has flip-flopped on a lot of his initial claims and promises. We will see how all that works out in the next 9 months. 

He (and his majority in Congress) are off to a rather tepid start IMHO. 

 


"Do not confuse motion and progress, A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress"
 
 

4/29/2017 12:33 pm  #2


Re: First 100 days

Considering the fact that Trump's party controls both the House and Senate, I would judge his first 100 days as a complete failure.
He's signed his name to a bunch of EO, some merely ordering people to do studies. Pretty thin soup.
His nomination of Gorsuch? No big deal. Gorsuch would have been on the short ist of any republican president.
Flynn was a disaster.
Nepotism is as rampant as is total lack of expertise and experience.

Trump respects generals. So, after the flynn fiasco he seemed to get a decent national security team.
But State is a mess.
And there are no generals who have domestic policy expertise.

Trump's thin skin and authoritarian instincts are less worrisome to me now, as I see that they are overshadowed by his complete lack of skills, and his utter incompetence.
That's a bright side, I guess.


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
 

4/30/2017 7:59 am  #3


Re: First 100 days

Kevin Williamson from the National Reviewput together the best analysis of Trump's first hundred daysthat I've come across so far.

We can quibble about the treatment of Merrick Garland and what type of SCOTUS justice Gorsuch will become, but on every other regard, Williamson is spot on.

President Trump’s first 100 days have been mostly a flurry of shallow symbolic gestures. There is a reality-television program called American Pickers, and what happens on it is this: A junkman drives around in a van and offers to buy other people’s junk, sometimes haggling over the price. The supporting characters are assistant junkmen and sundry onlookers. It is as though someone decided to remake Sanford and Son without actors, Redd Foxx’s humor, or a plot. (Or that nifty theme music.)

ts popularity is as inexplicable as it is undeniable. Because nothing actually happens on American Pickers, the show relies on the illusion of action, which is created through camerawork and editing. Junkman offers $x for a quantity of junk; Junk-Haver produces a look of concentration. The camera cuts quickly back and forth among the faces of Junkman, Deputy Junkman, Assistant Deputy Junkman, Junk-Haver, and Sundry Junk-Having Onlookers. And then there is a commercial for erection pills.

The application to the first 100 days of the Trump administration is of course obvious. President Donald J. Trump is a creature of reality television. He may not be very good at running hotels or casinos, but he is a gifted performer, a master of creating the illusion of action. As he marks his first 100 days in office (one day of a Trump presidency would have been incredible enough), what has President Trump actually done?

There is the confirmation of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. For that, the church bells should be rung. The Gorsuch confirmation represents a genuine and genuinely important political victory. That victory belongs to Mitch McConnell, the wily Republican leader in the Senate who understood that Barack Obama was an even lamer duck than he seemed and took the opportunity to hand an abusive and overreaching administration a political defeat of a kind never before dealt to an American president. Well done, Senator McConnell.

And well done, whoever had the job of explaining to Donald Trump what a Gorsuch is and keeping the president’s batty sister off the nation’s highest court.

hat else you got? Trump made a “solemn vow” that on his first day in office, he would label China a currency manipulator and slap sanctions on Beijing. A few weeks later, he reversed course, because — we have the president’s own word on this — somebody explained the issue to him. Solemn vows are not Donald Trump’s thing.

Trump repeatedly promised that the woefully misnamed Affordable Care Act would be repealed, and that this would be among his first actions in office. A few weeks later, he reversed course, because  — we have the president’s own word on this — somebody explained the issue to him. “Nobody knew health care could be so complicated!” he said.

As with many things Trump says, that is not quite true. It is not the case that nobody knew health care is complicated. Pretty much everybody who has given two seconds’ thought to the issue, read a copy of the Wall Street Journal (Hello, Mrs. Clinton!), or stood within 25 feet of Avik Roy knows that health care is complicated. Pretty much everybody but the reality-television host who was duly elected president of these United States knew that. President Trump is not a details guy.

There was going to be a wall paid for by Mexico. What there will be is some additional border fencing that Trump promises “eventually, at a later date, in some way” will be paid for by Mexico. We do not have the president’s word on this, but it seems likely that somebody explained that issue to him, too, things like how rivers work and what private property is, not to mention the niggling fact that most illegals do not enter the United States by wading across the Rio Grande or enter illegally at all.

Trump’s promised schedule was always absurd. And presidential candidates often make absurd promises about their first 100 days, forgetting about such minor details as Congress and the Constitution and democracy and all that. But Trump was, he assured us, a different kind of politician, a builder and a doer, a winner, a hard-charging negotiator. Which is to say, he convinced the electorate that he was in reality the character he plays on television. Many of his talk-radio and cable-news partisans are still trying to convince us that is the case, but it is not entirely clear that these reality-show performers are able to tell the difference between the political theater and the theater, between action and acting.

Instead of hard choices and committed action, what Trump has produced is a flurry of shallow gestures that create the illusion that he is doing something meaningful. But those executive orders range from the shoddy and unusable to the symbolic. He produced a “Buy American” executive order without quite seeming to understand that the Buy American Act already is law and has been since the administration of Herbert Hoover. Trump’s “Buy American” guidance is essentially a memo to federal agency heads asking them to think really hard about it before issuing one of the Buy American Act waivers that they routinely hand down in order to get around the fact that the Buy American Act rules are deeply stupid and entirely unpractical.

He met with some business leaders and announced that he had saved jobs by preventing a great deal of outsourcing that never was actually scheduled to happen. He made a lot of noise about saving the coal industry without taking into account that what is killing it is the natural-gas industry.

He installed a bunch of amateurs in the White House, including family members, none of whom has any particular experience or talent related to the portfolios given them. He abominated Goldman Sachs and then hired half of its old-timers league.

He has produced a vague and half-baked tax plan that many of his fellow Republicans have said they cannot support.

He can’t hire people or figure out what he thinks about China, Syria, or the Russians whose shenanigans are plaguing some of the associates he would dearly like to forget.

He threatened to pull out of NAFTA, which he does not have the legal power to do on his own, and then announced that he’d be renegotiating the trade accord without ever having said which of its provisions he objects to — or, indeed, ever publicly describing any of its provisions or the trade rules that it created.

Trump’s first 100 days are a bust. For the next 100, Republicans should try something else: Having Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell send him useful and responsible pieces of legislation to sign. These need not be dramatic and far-reaching: In fact, it would be better if they were not. Send him a bill reforming corporate taxes instead of a tax-reform omnibus. Create stronger federal penalties for employing illegal immigrants and see to it that federal law-enforcement agencies get serious about enforcing them. Figure out what you think about health care, if you can. Republicans will get reform the same way Johnny Cash got his Cadillac: one piece at a time.

Conservatives had better start facing the fact that the president is a man overmatched by his job. All of President Trump’s reality-television posturing, all of his hooting and hollering and fussing and foolishness and tweeting and preening is sound and fury signifying squat. The Trump administration is a show about nothing.

 


I think you're going to see a lot of different United States of America over the next three, four, or eight years. - President Donald J. Trump
 

4/30/2017 8:14 am  #4


Re: First 100 days

That's a good piece, Lager.
I urge everyone to look at Trump's EO in detail.
Yea, he juts his jaw out and proudly holds up the order like a 8 year old with a craft.

But, the EO don't really do much. Some of them are just orders to do studies. In other words, things he could have done with a phone call.


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
 

4/30/2017 10:05 am  #5


Re: First 100 days

Goose wrote:

That's a good piece, Lager.
I urge everyone to look at Trump's EO in detail.
Yea, he juts his jaw out and proudly holds up the order like a 8 year old with a craft.

But, the EO don't really do much. Some of them are just orders to do studies. In other words, things he could have done with a phone call.

But that would not be a photo op ! 
 


"Do not confuse motion and progress, A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress"
 
     Thread Starter
 

4/30/2017 3:30 pm  #6


Re: First 100 days

WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos criticized the media on Friday for placing so much emphasis on Donald Trump’s first hundred days, because “it’s so darn hard to count to a hundred.”

“I’m watching the news and they’re going on about a hundred days this and a hundred days that, and all I want to say is, ‘Who the heck can count all the way to a hundred?’ ” she said.

“They’re acting like we’re a bunch of math geniuses.”

DeVos added that, if the media wanted to establish a benchmark for Trump’s achievement, “they should have picked a number of days that people can actually count to, like five or ten.”

The Education Secretary then demonstrated how it was possible to count to ten using one’s hands.

Despite the media’s obsession with “ridiculously big numbers,” DeVos said she has no intention of trying to count to a hundred. “I have an important job and the last thing I need is to do something that makes my head hurt,” she said.

Last edited by Just Fred (4/30/2017 3:32 pm)

 

4/30/2017 4:06 pm  #7


Re: First 100 days

The distance between Andy's satire and the reality of idiot America is getting uncomfortably small.


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
 

4/30/2017 6:04 pm  #8


Re: First 100 days

The distance between Andy's satire and the reality of idiot America is getting uncomfortably small.

Scary, isn't it?  I don't see how we can preserve democracy at this rate..  I really don't.  Of all the cabinet positions important to maintaining a democratic society, the Department of Ed. may be the most important, and look what we've got.

Remember when Trump said he loves the under-educated during his campaign?  He meant it.

 

Last edited by Just Fred (4/30/2017 6:10 pm)

 

5/01/2017 5:08 am  #9


Re: First 100 days

Just Fred wrote:

The distance between Andy's satire and the reality of idiot America is getting uncomfortably small.

Scary, isn't it?  I don't see how we can preserve democracy at this rate..  I really don't.  Of all the cabinet positions important to maintaining a democratic society, the Department of Ed. may be the most important, and look what we've got.

Remember when Trump said he loves the under-educated during his campaign?  He meant it.

 

Well, we will still have elections. But, it will not be the republic that it once was. I agree, Fred. These are perilous times for our country.

I watched that shitshow in Harrisburg in horror. Authors have been warning for some time about the "Perpetual Campaign".  I think that, in 2017, we have arrived there. Over 5 months after the election that put Trump in the White House (and 3 1/2 years before he faces re-election) the President holds a campaign rally?
And the crowd? Are they asking about the healthcare bill?  The tax bill? Infrastructure? Just when they can expect the coal mining jobs to come back? 

No, they are chanting "Lock her up" in reference to the candidate who was defeated last year, and watching the President insult the people he might run against in 40 months.
The perpetual campaign.

Nobody seems to care what the government might actually do, the nuts and bolts about legislation, etc.
Politics is sport. It is a way of expressing hate for other groups. Let's face it. People didn't elect Donald Trump because of his health care plan. He didn't have one anymore than he had a plan to defeat ISIS. They elected Trump because he was successful in telling people what they want to hear, namely that their lot in life is the fault of the other side. He excelled at insulting the people they hate, and at promising painless solutions.

All the people care about is that their team should win. Everything from economic trends, health care to roads will then magically fall into place without their attention or participation.
But, you have to keep the hate up. You have to stay in election mode, every day, 24/7.

Sad.

Last edited by Goose (5/01/2017 5:37 am)


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
 

5/01/2017 5:42 am  #10


Re: First 100 days

First of all, by labeling these things 'rallies', the people that attend can be screened so the crowds are team supporters right from the start and therefore aren't likely to challenge him.  Secondly, I think there is something about the use of money raised for campaigning is not subject to the same rules as money used to host townhall type meetings. Am I right on these two points?

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum