The New Exchange

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



2/22/2017 10:18 am  #1


Trump's Chinese Trademark

I saw this story pop up last week as a blurb on Twitter and thought that it would have gained some traction in the larger media, but I haven't heard much else about it until this AP news report yesterday.

Since the Chinese government isn't the greatest at transparency, it's hard to provide the details I normally like to, but here's the crux of the story.....

1) Donald Trump has been trying to get a trademark on his name in China since 2006. Although there's been numerous court battles in China, the Chinese government has steadfastly refused to give him the trademark he's wanted. 

2) Trump becomes president-elect and sets Chinese hair on fire by talking to the President of Taiwan and questioning the United States position on the "One China" policy

3) Trump is inaugurated as President, talks to the Chinese president, and reaffirms the U.S. position in support of One China.

4) Within days, the Chinese government gives the Trump Organization a trademark on the Trump name.

What a coincidence.

Utah Sen. Lee to review Trump's Chinese trademark

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — Utah Sen. Mike Lee says he will look into whether President Donald Trump has violated the U.S. Constitution by being awarded valuable trademark rights to his own name by the Chinese government.

The Republican's statement on Tuesday came in response to a question posed by Utah Democratic Rep. Brian King after the Senator's speech to the state's House of Representatives, asking if he would investigate this.
Lee says he will review whether Trump's action violates the emoluments clause of the Constitution, which bars public servants from accepting anything of value from foreign governments unless explicitly approved by Congress.

The trademark news came as a surprise win for Trump after a decade of trying — and failing — to wrest the rights to his name.

 


I think you're going to see a lot of different United States of America over the next three, four, or eight years. - President Donald J. Trump
 

2/22/2017 12:50 pm  #2


Re: Trump's Chinese Trademark

Right ........... a real coincidence.

 

2/22/2017 12:57 pm  #3


Re: Trump's Chinese Trademark

Luckily, the prez has divested himself from all business dealings, and his sons, Don jr., and Eric are handling all that stuff without his involvement.

Remember when his attorney showed us that table full of file folders that proved that?

It was clear as mud, but it covered de groun'

 

2/22/2017 3:36 pm  #4


Re: Trump's Chinese Trademark

Rongone wrote:

Luckily, the prez has divested himself from all business dealings, and his sons, Don jr., and Eric are handling all that stuff without his involvement.

Remember when his attorney showed us that table full of file folders that proved that?

It was clear as mud, but it covered de groun'

RIGHT ! 
 


"Do not confuse motion and progress, A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress"
 
 

4/18/2017 12:35 pm  #5


Re: Trump's Chinese Trademark

Donald Trump declares that China is no longer a currency manipulator. 

Ivanka gets her Chinese trademarks.

On the same day the Chinese President is in Mar-A-Lago.

This can't be legal, right?

......First off, even people who couldn’t tell a trademark from a postmark can probably sense something amiss here. I mean Ivanka works in the West Wing. She’s involved in everything. And last I checked, “trade with China” is a huge part of “everything.” It’s very sweet that her lawyer, Jamie Gorelick, has assured everyone that, “Ivanka will not weigh in on business strategy, marketing issues, or the commercial terms of agreements,” and that Ivanka and Jared will be sure to “steer clear of specific areas that could impact her business, or be seen as conflicts of interest.” The only problem is that Gorelick has also been clear that from where she sits, Ivanka is “under no legal obligation” to step away from all things trade and China.

Quite a few lawyers, including Richard W. Painter, who served as chief White House ethics lawyer under President George W. Bush, seem to disagree. Painter told the Associated Press that Ivanka Trump should “put the business on hold and stop trying to get trademarks while you’re in government.” That would certainly be the more conservative way to go, ethically-speaking. But Ivanka’s lawyer has only committed to a recusal from “conversations about duties on clothing imported from China,” and to a “case-by-case” assessment of what Ivanka will and won’t do.

Whether or not there is a specific law prohibiting Ivanka’s dual role as West Winger and Chinapreneur, it is indisputable that the Trump presidency has positively impacted Ivanka’s fashion empire. Sales have been reported of 771 percent in February 2017 over the same month last year, after White House counselor Kellyanne Conway inappropriately told Fox viewers to “Go buy Ivanka’s stuff.” The bump doesn’t seem to be short-lived either. March sales are reported up 262 percent from last year.

There’s no indication of any sinister timing regarding the Trademark-A-Lago extravaganza, but the coincidence underscores an uncomfortable truth: those running our government are profiting from doing so. Whether that profit rises to the level of true, criminal “conflict of interest” is a matter for more specific inquiry. For now, one thing is clear: the dusty old Emoluments Clause is getting the 2017 award for “Best Newcomer.”


I think you're going to see a lot of different United States of America over the next three, four, or eight years. - President Donald J. Trump
     Thread Starter
 

4/18/2017 1:17 pm  #6


Re: Trump's Chinese Trademark

Using the presidency to promote the family business is first and foremost as we make America great again.

 

4/18/2017 2:00 pm  #7


Re: Trump's Chinese Trademark

We didn't elect a President, we elected a CEO ! 


"Do not confuse motion and progress, A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress"
 
 

4/18/2017 3:47 pm  #8


Re: Trump's Chinese Trademark

Our populist President. 


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum