Offline
Though this be madness, yet there is method in't.
Hamlet, Act 2. Scene 2.
Trump is at it again. He's making a completely unsupported claim that President Obama wire-tapped Trump Towers.
Why? Is he stupid? Is he insane?
Maybe Trump is insane, but he sure isn't stupid. He's done this before, and it has always benefitted him.
Trump first came to prominence by lying about the president's birthplace.
He lied about mexican immigrants.
He lied about seeing people in New Jersey cheering 9/11.
He lied about Marco, and Jeb.
He suggested that Ted Cruz's father was involved in the JFK assassination.
He lied about the murder rate.
He made up terrorist acts.
In the normal times such behavior would have made a politician a pariah and a laughing stock.
But these are not normal times.
Today is different. This new populism does not reason. It roars. Mistrust of institutions is so extreme among its advocates that they will believe a serial liar over the government, the media, and true statesmen. In fact, it's not even close. The new populism has at times an anarchic feel. Burn it down. Degrade and humiliate all before you.
Its supporters welcome the outrage their leader provokes. They revel in anger and outrage. This polarizes public discourse and enhances their sense of belonging.
Above all, the new populism requires a steady supply of villains for our hero to grapple with.
Low energy Jeb. Crazy Ben. Crooked Ted. Crooked Hillary. The intelligence services. The Mexicans. The Muslims. Globalists. Elites.
And now, the former President.
But the forever villain, The Establishment
So, Donald Trump, who has access to an immense intelligence apparatus, gets his news about Sweden from Tucker Carlson on Fox. Trump, who commands the FBI and justice department, believes that he is under wiretap because he heard it from Breitbart, and some lunatic radio host.
You see, it is essential for Trump to keep up the image of the Outsider.
So now, even when he heads the government, Trump acts act as if he were excluded from it.
MJF
Last edited by Goose (3/05/2017 7:29 am)
Offline
It's a classic immature argument technique: I accuse you of something, then you turn it around and point a finger at me. "I think you are mentally unstable", then you say, "No, you are the one who is unstable." The technique is used in playgrounds across America every day.
As far as villains are concerned, consider this: Would Superman be Superman without a super villain to fight?
The answer is 'no'. If Superman ran around saving dogs from being mistreated or helping old ladies across the street (you know, boy scout stuff), it wouldn't be big news. Superman needs a super villain. In Trump's case, if there isn't a super villain, then you simply manufacture one. Otherwise, Superman isn't Superman, he's just a nice guy.
Offline
Now Trump wants to suck Congress into investigating his baseless claim.
Another deflection, and diversion.
Yea, he's gonna make America Great Again.
Not even his focus.
Offline
If you have no means, plans, or ability to build yourself up, then you tear others down to look better than someone else. He did it throughout his campaign, he's doing it now, and I'm guessing that's how he rolls. Probably has done it all his life.
Offline
What a sad situation we Americans find ourselves in.
Now, the White House has been forced to call for a Congressional investigation.
After Trump's extraordinary claim, it was either that, or back down, admit to the world that the President got frustrated with his perdicament this weekend, and let loose a whopper.
The Republican Congress will feel compelled to protect their president, and go along with it.
How many dollars, and how many man-hours, will ultimately be wasted in covering for the madness of King Donald?
Last edited by Goose (3/05/2017 10:09 am)
Offline
I have said it before - he is an unbalanced individual.
Offline
First things first, I'd be really careful about assuming Trump is lying about Obama potentially ordering surveillance against Donald Trump of members of his campaign.
I think there are three ways this could go, and none of them are good.
1 - Trump is making up a story to distract from a more serious issue around collaborating with Russian operatives during the campaign.
2 - Obama did order surveillance of Trump for the sole purpose of trying to gain information to help Hillary Clinton. I've been listening to a couple of the Sunday shows and several people have said the president "can't order FBI surveillance. A president must go through the FISA courts (and in reality the Dept. of Justice would go to the FISA courts and not the White House) an obtain a warrant for surveillance activities." This is not true and you only need to go back to the George W. Bush era and the "Warrantless Wiretaps" that were considered constitutional because the president has the ability to look into concerns around foreign nations and national security concerns.
So in theory, Obama could have ordered a wire tap on Trump under the guise of national security. This is, in my opinion, a little conspiratorial, but not outside of the realm of possibility.
3 - The intelligence community and law enforcement had a reasonable suspicion that the Trump campaign and possibly Trump was doing something illegal with the Russian government and was able to obtain a warrant.
As President, it's my understanding that Trump would be able to get information from the FBI on investigations concerning him. So it's very possible that he did learn that there was surveillance being done on him.
But other than that, nobody really knows anything definitive.
However, throwing wild unproven allegations at Barack Obama to build or retain political capital is a tactic Trump has used in the past.
Also, the Trump era is exhausting.
Offline
Well, Lager, I give you credit for your caution. Time will tell whether the President is just full of crap, or whether a federal judge felt that there was probable cause that Trump or his staff were colluding with a foreign power. Neither is good.
A couple of observations.
1. The Hill and Politico are citing leaks from that leaky White House that Staff there were taken completely by surprise by Trump's accusation. Apparently, he was all alone when he "learned" of this wiretapping.
2. Trump offered no proof.
3. Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said Sunday that the intelligence agencies he supervised did not wiretap Donald Trump last year nor did the FBI obtain a court order through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to monitor Trump's phones.
4. Sean Spicer came out later to say that the White House was "not going to make further statements about this". In other words, they aren't going to release any proof.
You drop this grenade in the room, and then go mute.? That is strange
5. Trump has a history of lying. Bigly.
6. Trump likes to offer distraction when he is in a tight spot.
7. GOP Congressional members seem completely taken aback by the allegations.
8. The allegation came at the end of a very difficult week, and the Prez was said - again by leaks - to be incredibly frustrated.
9. It came out in a weekend tweet, which is historically when the Donald is unsupervised by Jared and the crazy comes out.
10. Sen. Marco Rubio said Sunday he had seen “no evidence” to back up Trump’s wiretap claims. Rubio is a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, which is investigating Trump’s ties to Russia and has received classified briefings on the issue.
My gut tells me that it's complete BS.
I mean, if it looks like a duck,,,,,,,,,
But, time will tell.
Last edited by Goose (3/05/2017 2:08 pm)
Offline
TheLagerLad wrote:
First things first, I'd be really careful about assuming Trump is lying about Obama potentially ordering surveillance against Donald Trump of members of his campaign.
I think there are three ways this could go, and none of them are good.
1 - Trump is making up a story to distract from a more serious issue around collaborating with Russian operatives during the campaign.
2 - Obama did order surveillance of Trump for the sole purpose of trying to gain information to help Hillary Clinton. I've been listening to a couple of the Sunday shows and several people have said the president "can't order FBI surveillance. A president must go through the FISA courts (and in reality the Dept. of Justice would go to the FISA courts and not the White House) an obtain a warrant for surveillance activities." This is not true and you only need to go back to the George W. Bush era and the "Warrantless Wiretaps" that were considered constitutional because the president has the ability to look into concerns around foreign nations and national security concerns.
So in theory, Obama could have ordered a wire tap on Trump under the guise of national security. This is, in my opinion, a little conspiratorial, but not outside of the realm of possibility.
3 - The intelligence community and law enforcement had a reasonable suspicion that the Trump campaign and possibly Trump was doing something illegal with the Russian government and was able to obtain a warrant.
As President, it's my understanding that Trump would be able to get information from the FBI on investigations concerning him. So it's very possible that he did learn that there was surveillance being done on him.
But other than that, nobody really knows anything definitive.
However, throwing wild unproven allegations at Barack Obama to build or retain political capital is a tactic Trump has used in the past.
Also, the Trump era is exhausting.
I would believe we WILL find out that people associated with Trump and possible even Trump himself were being investigated especially given what already has come out. For sure, the FBI has been conducting an ongoing investigation into the Russian influence and they themselves or other agencies likely included wiretaps. To be clear, the President himself unilaterally CANNOT order wiretaps without it going through processes to ensure that it is only done under certain circumstances. The investigation into this whole mess needs to be complete and thorough and not aimed at one conclusion.
Offline
10. Sen. Marco Rubio said Sunday he had seen “no evidence” to back up Trump’s wiretap claims. Rubio is a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, which is investigating Trump’s ties to Russia and has received classified briefings on the issue.
This is important point. I don't think there was one Senator who went on a TV show today and made a definitive claim one way or the other that there is evidence to support or deny Trump's claim. Meaning that everyone, including White House personnel and Trump's supposed allies in the GOP power structure within Washington, D.C. were all caught off guard.
Something that sits in the back of my mind and gives me concern is let's say that the FISA courts issued a warrant, or President Obama, in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief, ordered a warrantless wiretap and it's shown that there was no "smoking gun" between the Russians and the Trump campaign. This emboldens Trump to say that the intel community is against him and the press is against him, and the establishment is against him.
This is why I think it is very prudent for methodically and carefully investigate the claims Trump has made and if he's making stuff up, clearly explain the facts and data we have to show the nation that the President is full of crap.