Offline
Press coverage of Trump in first month of office: 88 percent ‘hostile,’ says new study
There was no press honeymoon for President Trump during his first month in office. A meticulous new study by the Media Research Center finds that 88 percent of the broadcast news coverage of Mr. Trump and his team was “hostile” during the first 30 days of office.“
Our measure of media tone excludes soundbites from identified partisans, focusing instead on tallying the evaluative statements made by reporters and the nonpartisan talking heads (experts and average citizens) included in their stories,” writes Rich Noyes, research director for the conservative press watchdog.“In their coverage of Trump’s first month, the networks crowded their stories with quotes from citizens angry about many of his policies, while providing relatively little airtime to Trump supporters.” he noted.
“And the networks’ anchors and reporters often injected their own anti-Trump editorial tone into the coverage. ‘It has been a busy day for presidential statements divorced from reality,’ CBS Evening News anchor Scott Pelley snidely began his February 6 broadcast.
Offline
What goes around, comes around.
Karma is an interesting thing.
Offline
Trump about Press in first 30 days 100% Hostile
Offline
Perhaps 88 % of his performance has deserved criticism.
If you ask me that number seems kind of low considering what he deserves.
Of course a lot of this depends on what you define as "hostile". Is reporting that his national security advisor lied about his Russian ties news or hostile treatment? Is the fact that Jeff sessions lied under oath hostile treatment or reporting the facts?
Last edited by Goose (3/02/2017 11:53 am)
Offline
I guess that Common would prefer this:
And this. Best at the 2:40 mark.
Last edited by Goose (3/02/2017 12:20 pm)
Offline
Press coverage of Trump in first month of office: 88 percent ‘hostile,’ says new study
I'm wondering how he got a 12% positive response.
Offline
This is hysterical coming from the Media Research Center...
Our measure of media tone excludes soundbites from identified partisans
I am assuming "Identified Partisan" equals anyone that the Media Research Center disagrees with.
And what is a media tone? Does anyone not named Sean Hannity not have the right "tone" when it comes to talking about President Trump? What a joke.
The Media Research Center (and Media Matters, for that matter) should be thrown in a deep pit and forgotten.
Bunch of partisan hacks.
Offline
Offline
Press coverage of Trump in first month of office: 88 percent ‘hostile,’ says new study
Trump brought it on himself. As we've read by several posters on various threads, it's the media's fault for taking him seriously and reporting what he says.