Offline
Common Sense wrote:
Brady Bunch wrote:
Sorry to inform you Fred and Rongone, but Common is correct that the Sanders part of the party is really upset. Unless the following story by CNN is fake news:
Thanks Brady..... still lots of raging here. It will calm down soon.
So, This CNN story you believe?
Tell me, what are the criteria you use to evaluate a news story? Don't bother, I think I got it
Offline
Sorry to inform you Fred and Rongone, but Common is correct that the Sanders part of the party is really upset. Unless the following story by CNN is fake news. - Brady
I was speaking for myself as a Bernie supporter that I wasn't bent over the choice of Perez. Ellison will be deputy chairman. It's not a big deal to me and I would say that to any fellow Sanders supporter.
Funny how CNN is singled out as a purveyor of 'fake news' when something is reported that doesn't line up with a pre-determined world view or conclusion, but completely trusted when CNN reports on something that lines up with something someone wants to believe.
Offline
Funny how CNN is singled out as a purveyor of 'fake news' when something is reported that doesn't line up with a pre-determined world view or conclusion, but completely trusted when CNN reports on something that lines up with something someone wants to believe. - Just Fred
Funny, I don't think I ever said anything about CNN (or any other news outlet) being fake news or attacking them. If you can find where I did say that, please let me know.
Offline
He may have been referring to your little friend
Offline
Funny, I don't think I ever said anything about CNN (or any other news outlet) being fake news or attacking them. If you can find where I did say that, please let me know. - Brady
It was a general observation about what people want to, or choose to believe in this highly charged political climate. Common gave the impression that there all kinds of turmoil and rage about Perez being named DNC Chairperson amongst the Bernie supporters and cited a piece by CNN. I was merely pointing out that as a Sanders supporter myself, my knickers didn't get knotted over it.
Offline
It was a general observation about what people want to, or choose to believe in this highly charged political climate. Common gave the impression that there all kinds of turmoil and rage about Perez being named DNC Chairperson amongst the Bernie supporters and cited a piece by CNN. I was merely pointing out that as a Sanders supporter myself, my knickers didn't get knotted over it. - Just Fred
I was the one who cited the CNN story, not Common. This prompted my response about me never attacking CNN or any other news outlet for fake news. I shared the piece as proof that Common was indeed correct in pointing out that the Sanders wing of the party was upset with the election of Perez. Common wasn't just giving people the impression there was turmoil, there was actual turmoil at the meeting. It is not up for debate, but is a fact.
Offline
Some Ellison supporters were upset.
Many were not.
That is not up for debate. It is fact
Offline
Brady Bunch wrote:
I shared the piece as proof that Common was indeed correct in pointing out that the Sanders wing of the party was upset with the election of Perez. Common wasn't just giving people the impression there was turmoil, there was actual turmoil at the meeting. It is not up for debate, but is a fact.
Dammit Fred, you *are* angry, we all know it and there's nothing you can tell us otherwise!
LOL.
Offline
opendoug wrote:
Brady Bunch wrote:
I shared the piece as proof that Common was indeed correct in pointing out that the Sanders wing of the party was upset with the election of Perez. Common wasn't just giving people the impression there was turmoil, there was actual turmoil at the meeting. It is not up for debate, but is a fact.
Dammit Fred, you *are* angry, we all know it and there's nothing you can tell us otherwise!
LOL.
Fred's "Raging "
Last edited by Goose (2/27/2017 12:32 pm)
Offline
Nowhere did I ever say Fred is angry, or even imply that he was.