The New Exchange

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



2/23/2017 12:28 pm  #1


Pruitt is the wrong guy for the job

Apparently Scott Pruitt thinks EPA stands for Enhancing Petroleum Activism instead of Environmental Protection Agency. Based on his past record detailed in recently made public exchanges with the petroleum industry, it is crystal clear that Mr. Pruitt's intentions are in not protecting the environment. His main focus will be to relieve any regulations aimed at Protecting the environment and punishing polluters. He is the exact opposite of the type of person that should be heading this agency.

And I thought Betsy DeVoid . . . Errrrr, I mean DeVos . . . was a terrible selection.

BTW, Pat Toomey voted in favor of both of these nominees. Where is he getting his information on the background of these so-called qualified public servants . . . From Sean Spicer, Kellyanne Conway, and Reince  Priebus?

Read this if you want to be enlightened about Pruitt's background in environmental activities:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/epa-chief-pruitts-new-emails-show-deep-ties-to-fossil-fuel-interests-184053662.html

Last edited by Rongone (2/23/2017 12:29 pm)

 

2/23/2017 12:35 pm  #2


Re: Pruitt is the wrong guy for the job

Pruitt, whether he is a good guy or a bad guy is completely unsuited to the job of protecting the nation's environment.
It would be as if Cruella De Vil were put in charge of the American Kennel Club.


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum