Offline
They have talked of repeal for 8 years, yet NOT one thought given to replacing it apparently !
Offline
I am a bit perplexed at why the Democrats haven't plastered the airwaves with ads this week telling the stories of people who whose lives have been saved by the ACA.
Offline
Maybe they are short on funds.
Or maybe content to watch republicans blow up the ACA and pay the consequences.
Medicare for all?
Offline
Goose wrote:
Maybe they are short on funds.
Or maybe content to watch republicans blow up the ACA and pay the consequences.
Medicare for all?
I can't imagine them hurting for money. I think it's probably a lack of organizational structure.
If they are content to sit back and hope the repubs screw it up, they are doing those who rely on the ACA a disservice.
Offline
Well, the dems don't have the votes to stop it
Offline
TheLagerLad wrote:
I am a bit perplexed at why the Democrats haven't plastered the airwaves with ads this week telling the stories of people who whose lives have been saved by the ACA.
They know they can't do anything to stop the "repeal", but I think they really want it to happen. While the ACA has helped people, there are some serious financial issues coming in the near future. If the Republicans repeal it, those financial issues probably don't come to fruition and the Dems avoid all blame, and if the issues do happen the Dems can blame it on the repeal. Then they hope the Republican's fail in their health plan and the Dems will point to all the people they helped and how it was better than what the Republican's did.
Pure politics, plain and simple
Offline
Brady Bunch wrote:
TheLagerLad wrote:
I am a bit perplexed at why the Democrats haven't plastered the airwaves with ads this week telling the stories of people who whose lives have been saved by the ACA.
They know they can't do anything to stop the "repeal", but I think they really want it to happen. While the ACA has helped people, there are some serious financial issues coming in the near future. If the Republicans repeal it, those financial issues probably don't come to fruition and the Dems avoid all blame, and if the issues do happen the Dems can blame it on the repeal. Then they hope the Republican's fail in their health plan and the Dems will point to all the people they helped and how it was better than what the Republican's did.
Pure politics, plain and simple
Seems EITHER would be considered political, would it not ?
Offline
tennyson wrote:
Brady Bunch wrote:
TheLagerLad wrote:
I am a bit perplexed at why the Democrats haven't plastered the airwaves with ads this week telling the stories of people who whose lives have been saved by the ACA.
They know they can't do anything to stop the "repeal", but I think they really want it to happen. While the ACA has helped people, there are some serious financial issues coming in the near future. If the Republicans repeal it, those financial issues probably don't come to fruition and the Dems avoid all blame, and if the issues do happen the Dems can blame it on the repeal. Then they hope the Republican's fail in their health plan and the Dems will point to all the people they helped and how it was better than what the Republican's did.
Pure politics, plain and simpleSeems EITHER would be considered political, would it not ?
I'm not sure sure I follow, can you elaborate on what you mean when you say either would be considered political? Are you referring to the Republican repeal and replace?
Offline
What a sorry state this country is now in. We may build a billion dollar wall but we cannot continue to provide health insurance for millions of the previously uninsured.
Offline
Brady Bunch wrote:
tennyson wrote:
Brady Bunch wrote:
They know they can't do anything to stop the "repeal", but I think they really want it to happen. While the ACA has helped people, there are some serious financial issues coming in the near future. If the Republicans repeal it, those financial issues probably don't come to fruition and the Dems avoid all blame, and if the issues do happen the Dems can blame it on the repeal. Then they hope the Republican's fail in their health plan and the Dems will point to all the people they helped and how it was better than what the Republican's did.
Pure politics, plain and simpleSeems EITHER would be considered political, would it not ?
I'm not sure sure I follow, can you elaborate on what you mean when you say either would be considered political? Are you referring to the Republican repeal and replace?
I was referring to the taking to the airwaves that Lager alluded to vs