Offline
NYT in Iowa? Hey maybe they are learning something?
In Iowa, Trump Voters Are Unfazed by Controversies
MONTICELLO, Iowa — The Table of Knowledge was delving into President-elect Donald J. Trump’s plans to upend government, and marveling at how he had forced his fellow Republicans in the House to reverse themselves on gutting the Office of Congressional Ethics.“He’s getting responses; things are happening,” Jerry Retzlaff, a retiree, said. “He got Congress to turn themselves around with one tweet.”“There’s no secret the press doesn’t like him, and neither does a lot of the leadership,” he added. “And that’s because he’s planning on making a lot of changes.”
The eight men around a rectangular table, sipping coffee from a hodgepodge of mugs donated by customers, meet daily for breakfasts of French toast, eggs and bacon at Darrell’s diner, all while solving the world’s problems, hence their gathering’s nickname.
Washington may be veering from one Trump pre-inaugural controversy to another: unproved reports of Russia’s holding embarrassing information against him, possible ethical conflicts, the donors and billionaires of his cabinet, his pushback against intelligence findings on Russian hacking in the election. But there does not seem to be much angst in Iowa among those who voted for Mr. Trump, including some Democrats and independents.
Monticello, in rural eastern Iowa, is as close as any place to the epicenter of the political quake that made Mr. Trump president.The state’s longstanding reputation as a political bellwether had led The New York Times to move me to Iowa for a full year ahead of its presidential caucuses in early 2016.I had not returned since. In the intervening year, Iowa gaveMr. Trump his largest triumph of any battleground state: a 15-percentage-point reversal over President Obama’s easy victory here in 2012.
Al Ameling, 58, a technical analyst who lives in Marble Rock, near the Minnesota border, is representative of the profound demographic shift among white rural voters in the northern Midwest that helped produce Mr. Trump’s stunning upset. Mr. Ameling voted for Mr. Obama in 2008, sat out in 2012 and enthusiastically backed Mr. Trump. Nothing he has heard since Election Day has shaken his support, including reports this week that American intelligence agencies are investigating unverified accounts of meetings between Trump aides and Russian officials, as well as sex tapes purportedly made of Mr. Trump in Moscow.
On Wednesday, Mr. Trump called the allegations completely false.“The way it is nowadays, unless I see positive proof, it’s all a lie,” Mr. Ameling said in a telephone interview on Wednesday. He added he was more concerned that government officials might have leaked the material to the news media. “I don’t know if it was classified, but if it was, whoever leaked it needs to go to jail,” he said. “We need law and order back in this country.”
Read the full story at the link
Offline
This is hardly the first time that the NYT has reported from Iowa. If you were to read the paper on a daily basis you might be surprised, gain a new perspective, and eschew you preconceived stereotypes.
The Table of Knowledge was delving into President-elect Donald J. Trump’s plans to upend government, and marveling at how he had forced his fellow Republicans in the House to reverse themselves on gutting the Office of Congressional Ethics.“He’s getting responses; things are happening,”
Wait a minute, common. Every time anybody here criticizes The Don, you say that it's not appropriate because trump "hasn't even been sworn in yet, and hasn't done anything".
But then you so gleefully share praise about all that he has done.
How does that work?
Last edited by Goose (1/12/2017 3:03 pm)
Offline
By the way, great to see you reading the NYT, common.
A sign of growth! Good for you.
A question to ponder:
Has Breitbart, or Fox, or LegalInsurrection, ever run such a piece by a reporter, one that presents it's readers with a chance to honestly understand the concerns of Clinton voters in their bubble?
You see what I'm saying? Maybe the NYT isn't so bad,,,,,,,
Last edited by Goose (1/12/2017 2:38 pm)
Offline
Goose wrote:
A question to ponder:
Has Breitbart, or Fox, or LegalInsurrection, ever run such a piece by a reporter, one that presents it's readers with a chance to honestly understand the concerns of Clinton voters in their bubble?
,,
I guess I will take the silence as a "No".