The New Exchange

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



11/18/2016 2:51 pm  #1


‘Sanctuary churches’ vow to shield immigrants from Trump crackdown

‘Sanctuary churches’ vow to shield immigrants from Trump crackdown



PHILADELPHIA (RNS) First came the mayors of New York, Chicago and Seattle declaring their cities “sanctuaries” and saying they will protect undocumented immigrants from President-elect Donald Trump’s plan to deport them.

Then thousands of students, professors, alumni and others at elite universities including Harvard, Yale and Brown signed petitions asking their schools to protect undocumented students from any executive order.

Now, religious congregations, including churches and synagogues, are declaring themselves “sanctuaries” for immigrants fleeing deportation.

On Tuesday (Nov. 15), an undocumented Mexican and father of three, who says he is determined to stay in the United States for the sake of his children, appeared at a news conference at Arch Street United Methodist Church, where he is seeking sanctuary from deportation by federal authorities.

Javier Flores fled to the church ahead of an order to surrender to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The 40-year-old north Philadelphia resident had entered the United States without papers in 1997. Since then, he was deported and re-entered multiple times.

“Today and every day, if Javier and his family choose to stay with us, they will have a home with us,” said the Rev. Robin Hynicka, senior pastor,  at the news conference at his Center City church.

During his campaign, Trump vowed to deport an estimated 11 million foreigners. Since his election victory, he said he would immediately deport 2 to 3 million undocumented immigrants who have been convicted of crimes.

“What we are going to do is get the people that are criminal and have criminal records, gang members, drug dealers, we have a lot of these people, probably 2 million, it could be even 3 million, we are getting them out of our country or we are going to incarcerate,” Trump told “60 Minutes” correspondent Lesley Stahl.

Alongside enforcement of immigration laws, Trump vowed to build a massive wall along the U.S.-Mexico border to keep out immigrants.


In the wake of the elections, there’s been an “outpouring of inquiries and support” from congregations across the country that want to sign on as sanctuary sites, said Peter Pedemonti, executive director of the New Sanctuary Movement of Philadelphia.

“Churches are saying, ‘We want to do this. How do we get started?’” said Pedemonti, whose coalition includes 17 churches and two synagogues that have banded together to oppose deportations and offer their sanctuaries as safe havens.

But just how many faith communities are willing to harbor undocumented immigrants is hard to gauge.

Since 2014, 13 churches in nine cities have provided sanctuary to 15 people at risk of imminent deportation, said Noel Andersen, national grass-roots coordinator for Church World Service, which provides legal services for immigrants.

Andersen estimated there are 400 congregations nationwide that support the efforts or are willing to open their doors to people fearing repatriation.

Churches, along with schools and hospitals, are considered “sensitive locations” by Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Customs and Border Protection. That means federal agents will avoid arresting, searching or interviewing people there under most circumstances.

The sanctuary tradition can be traced back to the Hebrew Bible. The Book of Numbers cites six sanctuary cities throughout biblical Israel where a person who accidentally killed another could take refuge from anyone avenging the killing.

A more contemporary version is the American “sanctuary church” movement of the 1980s, in which hundreds of Central American refugees trying to avoid deportation sought shelter in churches.

But it’s far from clear how big a role houses of worship will play in harboring undocumented immigrants in today’s political climate.

President-elect Trump won 81 percent of white evangelical voters. While some evangelical groups such as the Evangelical Immigration Table have championed immigration reform, their efforts have not led to movement on the national level.

The major Hispanic evangelical organizations are socially conservative, opposing abortion and favoring broader religious freedom laws. They have advocated for comprehensive immigration reform but have not joined the sanctuary movement.

“Churches need to follow their conscience,” said the Rev. Gabriel Salguero, president of the National Latino Evangelical Coalition.

“If they feel they need to protect undocumented immigrants, they’re within their biblical and theological right to do so. But the real preference is immigration reform. Sanctuary churches is a response. It’s not the answer.”

About 65 percent of Hispanic voters voted for Hillary Clinton, according to exit poll data; Trump won 29 percent of their vote.

“What we have been seeking is a true change in the system,” said Tony Suarez, who serves on Trump’s Evangelical Executive Advisory Board. “All this is a result of a broken system.”

Suarez is executive vice president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, which counts 40,118 participating churches, the largest Hispanic evangelical association in the country.

He said the advisory board has been meeting with the president-elect or his advisers on a weekly basis and that their immigration policy is “still evolving.” But he added the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference will advocate for “justice and mercy” for all undocumented people.

The case of Flores, who has no criminal convictions, shows how difficult it may be for undocumented immigrants to flee to churches.

He is a Catholic, but he sought refuge in a United Methodist Church. Although  U.S. Catholic bishops urged Trump to adopt humane policies toward immigrants and refugees earlier this week, not every bishop is likely to advocate for sanctuary churches.

Trump won the overall Catholic vote by 7 percentage points over Hillary Clinton, 52-45.

Protestant mainline churches, more liberal Catholic churches and Jewish synagogues however, are expected to join the movement and open their doors to people seeking refuge.

“It’s really key that people of faith be active, especially white America,” said Hynicka, of Arch Street United Methodist. “It’s time to put your bodies, buildings and assets on the line.”

(Elizabeth Evans is a freelance reporter based in the Philadelphia area)

http://religionnews.com/2016/11/18/sanctuary-churches-vow-to-shield-immigrants-from-trump-crackdown/


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
 

11/18/2016 5:34 pm  #2


Re: ‘Sanctuary churches’ vow to shield immigrants from Trump crackdown

Why in the world would a Christian church take a stand against those who would reject the disenfranchised, poor, oppressed, and down-trodden people?

 

11/19/2016 7:09 am  #3


Re: ‘Sanctuary churches’ vow to shield immigrants from Trump crackdown

Just Fred wrote:

Why in the world would a Christian church take a stand against those who would reject the disenfranchised, poor, oppressed, and down-trodden people?

Yea, it's like they're acting like Jesus or something.
Show-offs!


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
     Thread Starter
 

11/21/2016 8:04 am  #4


Re: ‘Sanctuary churches’ vow to shield immigrants from Trump crackdown

I'm curious.

Why do religious organizations believe they are outside the law?



 


If you make yourself miserable trying to make others happy that means everyone is miserable.

-Me again

---------------------------------------------
 

11/21/2016 8:13 am  #5


Re: ‘Sanctuary churches’ vow to shield immigrants from Trump crackdown

Conspiracy Theory wrote:

I'm curious.

Why do religious organizations believe they are outside the law?



 

They believe that they have a duty to God that sometimes demands resistance to injustice,
Even if it defies Caesar.

Last edited by Goose (11/21/2016 8:14 am)


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
     Thread Starter
 

11/21/2016 11:43 am  #6


Re: ‘Sanctuary churches’ vow to shield immigrants from Trump crackdown

I can understand taking a stand against injustice but is violating the law a moral act?


If you make yourself miserable trying to make others happy that means everyone is miserable.

-Me again

---------------------------------------------
 

11/21/2016 11:55 am  #7


Re: ‘Sanctuary churches’ vow to shield immigrants from Trump crackdown

I can understand taking a stand against injustice but is violating the law a moral act?

Depends, CT.  We could probably find dozens of examples during the civil rights struggle.
 

 

11/21/2016 12:25 pm  #8


Re: ‘Sanctuary churches’ vow to shield immigrants from Trump crackdown

Conspiracy Theory wrote:

I can understand taking a stand against injustice but is violating the law a moral act?

Ask Martin Luther King.
Our country has a rich history of civil disobedience.
Sometimes it has nudged the republic in the direction of living up to its own ideals.

"I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law."
Martin Luther King Jr.

Last edited by Goose (11/21/2016 12:29 pm)


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
     Thread Starter
 

11/21/2016 6:35 pm  #9


Re: ‘Sanctuary churches’ vow to shield immigrants from Trump crackdown

Civil disobedience in the name of Christianity began in the months following the Day of Pentecost in A.D. 33, when the disciples defied a stern order to cease and desist from preaching the Resurrection of Christ.   Their response was "we must obey God rather than man"  (Acts 5)

A few years later the Apostle Paul was instructing the Christian community at Rome that everyone "should be obedient to the governing authorities" and writing his protege Timothy to "offer prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings for all people, for kings and those who are in authority".....this at a time when Nero was covering Christians with pitch and setting them afire for torches for his garden parties.

After that, the Apostle John the Theologian took a much dimmer view of governmental authority.   It is always good to balance Romans 13 with Revelation 13.


Life is an Orthros.
 

11/21/2016 7:09 pm  #10


Re: ‘Sanctuary churches’ vow to shield immigrants from Trump crackdown

Well, the Churches will be filled to the brims. Hope they add extra rooms. 

I am being sarcastic. It is a wonderful (and totally Christian) gesture, but pretty much that is all it can be. 

 


"Do not confuse motion and progress, A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress"
 
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum