Offline
Trump wants to get rid of MSM - well nothing exactly new from the R-tribe about that, but lately ire has turned even on Fox News from Trump and Breitbart (now pretty much Trump News). We will see soon especially depending on the outcome what the remains of Fox News will be.
With Ailes on the outside and looking - who knows ?
Offline
Did you see Gingrich attacking Megyn Kelley?
Absolutely unhinged hysteria on his part.
Yea, the Alt Right is NOT going to embrace Fox News,,,,,,,, unless Fox purges itself of all integrity.
Offline
Amazing how fast the MMSM (Mythical Main Stream Media) changes sides, isn't it.
Whoever is losing claims the MMSM is supporting the other side.
Offline
.........unless Fox purges itself of all integrity.
Well, that would be a short leap would it not?
Offline
From my perspective, Fox 'news' will continue on as they are now. They have their ratings, advertisers, personalities, and viewers. They may lose some viewers temporarily to a Breitbart backed Trump 'news' network (that I predict will fail within 1 year, if it ever comes to fruition in the first place), but a post Ailes Fox 'news' will continue on its path of mega partisan crucifixion of the democrats and exaltation of republicans through reporting by jerks like O'Reilly, Watters, Doocy, Carlson, Bolling, Hegseth, Kilmeade, Napolitano, Ingraham, North, Rove, Ablow, and a bevy of buxom, bubble headed, female 'reporters' in skin tight clothes. Their audience sucks this stuff up like a Dyson vacuum on steroids.
Last edited by Rongone (10/26/2016 2:17 pm)
Offline
My big prediction is that Megyn Kelly will end up at CNN post election.
But if Trump TV really takes off, I think FOX becomes more of a centrist GOP channel. Yeah, O'Reilly will probably stick around, but I could see a higher profile for folks like Shep Smith and Bret Baier in primetime.
Offline
I'm going with rongone's post #5. I really don't give a rat's ass what these people do. The world is passing them by.
Offline
I guess it depends on what Fox wants to do with their business model.
Are they content with their current audience, which was older, and whiter than the nation, and in danger of atrophying,,, or do they want to expand their audience.
Seeing how hard they try to keep Kelly will be a hint of where the network wants to go.
Offline
Here is a good article critiquing Trump Tower streaming webcasts . . . Possibly a precursor to a Trum 'news' TV network:
Live from Trump Tower, the Ultimate Conspiracy
Maybe the wisest bit of cautionary advice I ever heard about the media came from my brother-in-law, Paul, who grew up in rural Virginia. “Just remember, son,” Paul’s Uncle Russell used to tell him, “paper’ll lay down and let you write whatever you want on it.”
I wonder what Uncle Russell would have said about the new social media like Facebook Live and Twitter, which don’t lie down so much as stand up and scream: “Give us your lies and self-deception! We’re here for you!” Whatever you want to believe now, there’s some bogus chart or viral video popping up somewhere to validate it.
Which leads me to the latest innovation in campaign propaganda: Trump Tower TV, which launched this week on Facebook.
Think of it as an unreality show, airing inside an actual reality show, which is airing under the guise of an actual presidential campaign. It’s like one of those Russian nesting dolls, which in Donald Trump’s case may be an especially apt metaphor.
Trump’s feed, streaming live from the “war room” in Trump Tower, is remarkable in that it self-consciously mimics everything about your conventional cable show. There’s lively banter between the hosts, a parade of genial guests who appear to have just dropped in, a platinum blond bomb-throwing commentator with no particular qualifications in anything. There’s breaking coverage of Trump’s evening rally, perfectly timed to make air.
It shows you, basically, how easy it is for any moron with a laptop and a dream to perfectly imitate the cheerful vacuousness of most TV news.
In its content, though, Trump Tower TV is essentially a long and monotonous infomercial. On Trump’s nightly feed, he’s winning the election handily, crushing it in early voting, surging in swing states, humiliating the media and their pollsters. It’s a full-on rout.
The feed isn’t hurting for A-list guests. On the first night, Kellyanne Conway, Trump’s campaign manager, showed up, looking vaguely embarrassed and vowing to win a campaign she has zero expectation of winning.
But hey, at least Conway’s going to walk away from this wreck famous and marketable. She was followed on set by poor Sean Spicer, lead strategist for the Republican National Committee, which at this point is a little like saying you’re the chief culinary officer for Chef Boyardee.
Asked to recount his favorite moment of the campaign, Spicer talked about finding a sign from the spin room that somebody left outside.
Oh, man, crazy times.
Spicer seems like a genuinely nice guy and a smart operative, which is why it’s hard not to feel a little sorry for him as he writhes through interviews, paying homage to “Mr. Trump” as a businessman and then pivoting wherever possible to how awful Hillary Clinton and the media are.
He’s like a real estate agent trying to sell you a house where an entire family was just brutally murdered. But have you seen the attic? It runs the length of the house!
All of this unfolded, by the way, even as Trump himself seemed to be turning his attention to the world after the election. While Mike Pence tried to save a gasping campaign in Utah, a state in which no viable Republican should ever have to set foot after March, Trump was pausing to promote his hotels in Florida and Washington, D.C.
As New York magazine reported a few weeks ago, Trump’s brand-new, high-end Washington hotel, situated in the old post office near the White House, is already in trouble. It was the only luxury hotel in town that was discounting rooms before the recent IMF meetings, presumably because nobody with that kind of cash or worldliness wanted to give him any business.
There’s a connection here to the new nightly talk show, whether or not it presages a full-blown Trump TV network built to rival Fox News.
Surely Trump understands at this point that he’s been rebranded. After a lifetime of trying to associate his name with ostentatious luxury, excess and aristocracy, in a never-ending quest to rise above his outer-borough roots, he’ll emerge from the campaign having mostly down-market appeal.
His main consumer base from here on out isn’t going to be the status-conscious millionaire who gets a kick out of tasteless gold trimming on everything. It’s going to be the working-class consumer who watched his show and came to his rallies, who aspires to wealth but can never afford a room at the Trump International.
And so Trump Tower TV isn’t only about reaching Trump’s voter; it’s about consolidating his new consumer base, too.
More to the point, though, Trump’s newscast is telling us something about where the rest of us are headed, too. Because if you watch it for a while, you come away understanding that he isn’t attacking the integrity of the process just so he can lose without having to admit defeat.
No, he’s doing something we’ve really never seen a nominee do: deliberately setting out to make it impossible for the next president to govern effectively.
The overarching message of Trump Tower TV, which might otherwise be known as the Wonderland Network, is that Trump can’t possibly lose the election — unless evil Democrats, turncoat Republicans and America-hating reporters succeed in conspiring to overturn the will of the electorate.
In case you don’t think this message is getting through, just read the acid viewer comments floating at the bottom of the screen, like a news crawl, which tell you that the election is rigged and that Clinton is a killer or the devil, or maybe both.
Or you can check out the latest poll from USA Today and Suffolk University, which found that more than four in 10 Trump voters say they won’t accept the legitimacy of the new administration if he loses.
There’s no political reason for a nominee to so enthusiastically validate this kind of absurd paranoia, unless his mindset is that of a spurned soap opera mistress: If I can’t have the presidency, then no one can.
This is a pattern for Trump. He spent the last several years trying to delegitimize Barack Obama’s presidency, spreading false rumors about his lineage. Now he’s trying to preemptively delegitimize Clinton, by establishing an entire alternative media dedicated to the proposition that she can’t possibly win without some monstrous act of unspecified fraud.
Clinton may or may not have what it takes to respond to unseen crises and build some consensus around an agenda — I have my doubts. But probably no one can do that if a quarter of the electorate is sworn to resist some imaginary usurpation of power.
What Trump is doing now is unpatriotic, and it’s dangerous.
You have to wonder what people like Conway and Spicer make of this. You’d like to think they’re up at night, wondering if so vocally abetting this effort to undermine democracy is really what they came here to do.
I think I know what Uncle Russell might make of it. At least paper had the decency to fold.