Offline
Mr. Toomey and his re-election campaign are in trouble . . . And he knows it. Thus the true politician in him continues to morph as he struggles to pander to voters that do not favor a particular position. Mr. Toomey will 'pivot' on a daily basis if necessary and change his previously stated position to a completely different one to try to gain votes. Unfortunately, Mr. Toomey's underlying base stance on many of those issues have not changed. So, from my perspective, he's just being disingenuous in an effort to hold on to his Senate seat. For that reason alone, he should not be re-elected.
Margaret Carlson: Pat Toomey’s in trouble
Republican Sen. Pat Toomey should be coasting to another term in Pennsylvania, which rarely throws out an incumbent. The state, which has a sizable population of older voters, likes its politicians familiar, its funnel cakes deep-fried and its coffee burnt. Only once in 40 years has a governor failed to win re-election.
But this could be an out-of-character year. Mr. Toomey’s Democratic challenger, Katie McGinty, is a first-time candidate in a swing state, yet most polls have shown her ahead of the Republican incumbent.
What’s pulling down Mr. Toomey is what’s hampering Republicans in other swing states: Donald Trump. Nationwide, Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton is polling about five points ahead of her Republican rival but, in places such as Pennsylvania, the gap in her favor is nine points or more. Mr. Trump boasted that he would win the Keystone State if not for “cheating,” even though Pennsylvania’s voter ID law was overturned when proponents were unable to present one case of fraud to the court.
Having Mr. Trump at the top of the ballot puts Mr. Toomey in a bind: He can either cast off the party’s standard-bearer or stick with him and likely go down with him. Mr. Toomey doesn’t want to alienate the white, male voters in formerly Democratic hard-hit industrial towns who are grateful that Mr. Trump is feeling their pain, or at least channeling it. But he needs to woo independents and moderate Republicans in the suburbs around Philadelphia, which have more voters than Philadelphia and Pittsburgh combined.
Even if Mr. Trump successfully pivots — a bland term for desperately turning against what you had been for — the candidate’s unacceptable taint remains. His thin skin and hot head, his demeaning of anyone who dares to disagree with him from the grieving Muslim-American Gold Star parents to a disabled reporter, his willful ignorance about governing and arrogance that he knows more than the generals can’t be wished away. Just ask about Mr. Trump in a Pittsburgh suburb and the answer is no, or never, or worse.
Mr. Toomey, a former banker, was elected to the House in 1999 preaching term limits. He fudged on a promise to quit after three terms by running for the Senate in 2004. He lost, won in 2010 and has followed a right-of-center course since.
His low-key demeanor belies the extremity of his views. He is pro-life with rare exceptions, favors upper-income tax cuts, is pro-fossil fuels and against gay marriage. He was the top free-trade proponent in the Senate (formerly president of the Club for Growth). He did an Olympic-level flip-flop when he got so worried about losing that he abandoned his support for the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
Ms. McGinty is the opposite of low-key: personable, energetic and given to bright colors and big hugs. Mr. Toomey has tried to drag her down by dwelling on Hillary Clinton at the top of the ticket, but despite her email problems and the Clinton Foundation, he hasn’t gotten much traction.
Ms. McGinty served as the top environmental adviser to President Bill Clinton, in the Cabinet of former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell and as chief of staff to the current governor, Tom Wolf. She is the mom next door, one of 10 children of a restaurant worker and cop who walked the beat in Northeast Philly. She attended St. Joseph’s College on a scholarship, is pro-choice, pro-clean air, in favor of raising the minimum wage and protecting Social Security.
The Democratic candidate is an advocate for dealing with climate change, while Mr. Toomey doesn’t believe the phenomenon is caused by human activity and isn’t rushing to do anything about it.
Mr. Toomey’s campaign trope is a “bus tour” (technically an RV) that will take him to every county in the state. On Aug. 18, he knocked off two, speaking at a VFW hall in Pittsburgh and then appearing two hours away in bucolic Greensburg.
In pressed khakis and checkered Oxford shirt, Mr. Toomey is mild-mannered, like the neighbor happy to lend you his hedge clippers and forgive you for not bringing them back. He opens with a line about how Ms. McGinty began her career as an adviser to Vice President Al Gore, which always gets a laugh. He goes on to hold her responsible for Mr. Wolf’s tax increase.
He doesn’t go after immigration with Mr. Trump’s enthusiasm but spends an inordinate amount of time condemning sanctuary cities, which he says allow the undocumented to hide and commit crimes (Philadelphia is one) and points to the legislation he has introduced to halt the practice. Like Mr. Trump, he’s for repealing Obamacare.
This is Ms. McGinty’s first campaign, and she has made rookie mistakes. She forgot the fact that even friendly audiences tape remarks (at the Democratic National Convention, she smudged her Catholic schoolgirl image by calling her opponent an unprintable name). But mostly, she’s a happy warrior who’s kept a trace of her working-class roots and honors those like her family who practice a trade. She talks movingly about the opportunity she got to go to college in a way that young people today can’t in a state with the third-highest rate of student debt in the country.
When she calls Mr. Toomey’s stance on guns shameful, she smiles. In a state that contains both deer-hunters, who favor no new laws, and suburbanites, who want tougher ones, it’s hard to thread the needle.
With an eye on the latter, Mr. Toomey co-sponsored a bill to strengthen background checks after the massacre of schoolchildren at Sandy Hook in Connecticut, but he’s since voted with the National Rifle Association to block laws that would ban assault weapons and large ammunition clips and deny guns to those on the terrorist watch list. He voted in favor of a Republican compromise bill, which was opposed by the NRA but failed to pass. The Senate Majority PAC has begun a $1 million ad buy that shows Mr. Toomey at a small event in July saying that he has a “perfect record” with the NRA.
In Ms. McGinty, Mr. Toomey is facing a candidate tailor-made for the New Pennsylvania. After his talk in Greensburg, the Republican grimaced at the inevitable question about the man hovering over his re-electon bid. “I like some things Trump’s done — his Supreme Court picks, Mike Pence,” he said, adding that he had some “real concerns” nonetheless. In other words, he’s playing the undecided card as if the jury is out on Mr. Trump’s worthiness to be president. That tactic will succeed only if he believes Old Pennsylvania can pull him across the finish line.
Offline
I agree with Carlson that Toomey is in a very tough spot. I think any republican in Pennsylvania running for statewide office has a fine line to walk in appealing to both the hard core conservatives in central PA and coal territory in southwest while not alienating the moderate soccer mom in the Philly suburbs.
I cannot disagree more with Carlson's assertion that Kate McGinty is a "tailor-made candidate" for Pennsylvania in 2016.
Yes, she checks off the boxes of all major Dem party platform positions. But in watching some of her campaign stops and events on PCN, and watching her campaign for governor in 2014, I find her to be somewhat of an empty suit who just happens to be in tight with PA Dem party leaders.
For me, the Senate race is going to be the toughest vote. There are basic positions of Toomey's that I cannot get in line with. And I think his general constituent services are very weak (you can't get a response back from his office for months)
On the other hand, I like that Toomey, who I didn't vote for in 2010, in his first term generally has kept his head down, worked hard, and was one of the few Senators who would cross party lines from time to time.
Offline
My experience with Toomey's constituent services have been little or no response when I contact him, but plenty of e-mails, mailers etc. from him, most of which are negative advertising about his opponent, now that the election is coming up. When received the responses from Toomey/his staff tend to be curt, party line letters that somebody pulls out of the canned response file for related subject matter.
My main problem with Toomey is his near election "pivoting" on positions as he sticks his finger in the wind to see which way the electorate is blowing. His voting record is evidence of his over 90% Republican Party line agreement. He tends to over-emphasize the few times he has actually reached across the aisle, formulated bi-partisan legislation, and brought that legislation to a vote without amending it to fit with his financial supporters (like the NRA) demands. I don't like the way he talks out of both sides of his mouth and contradicts his statements to the press and constituents with his actions in the senate. From my perspective, he's had his chance to show his stuff, and what he has demonstrated to me is that he is a cog in the obstructionist machine that our legislature has become. So, again from my perspective, it's time to change that part in the inefficient, do-nothing, partisan political machine.
Last edited by Rongone (9/16/2016 11:57 am)
Offline
Well said, Rongone. PA voters have a great opportunity to give Toomey his walking papers and not allow him to become another R hangers-on.
Offline
It would be helpful for McGinty to win from the perspective of helping Hillary Clinton (should she win) getting the SCOTUS vacancy filled, as well as all of our cabinet position on-boarded.
Offline
I was wondering who McGinty was.
I do not watch TV or listen to commercial radio but political ads are beginning to infect the non-subscription games I like.
Apparently McGinty is rich, regularly takes bribes (only implied, not stated), and is the pure personification of Evil.
That's capital 'E' Evil.
This must be correct, it's on the internet.
Offline
I disagree with the first 2 paragraphs of the opinion piece. I'm not sure how Toomey is supposed to be coasting to re-election. Voter turnout during presidential election years has been heavily Democratic since the 90's. Also, as noted Trump at the top of the ticket was dragging down Toomey when this opinion piece was written on 9/1/16. More recent polls have now shown this race to be a dead heat or Toomey slightly ahead, and those polls were taken before Trump's resurgence. I would presume Toomey now has a couple point lead over McGinty.
Lager's perception of McGinty as an "empty suit" is right on. In my previous role, I had limited contact with her and that description is very appropriate. You could tell she was bidding her time working for the Wolf administration in order to run for the Senate. If you want someone who will vote 100% of the time with the Dem leadership and not be bipartisan, she is your person. For me, no thanks.
I will be voting for Toomey in November