Offline
Common Sense wrote:
tennyson wrote:
His supporters won't care from what I have seen.
No you are mixed up a bit tennyson....
It's the Clinton supporters who are so blind that they do not see that Clinton has disqualified herself from serving as president after she for years put our national security at risk by placing highly classified materiel on her home brew server. And then when confronted with this she lied time after time after time for over a year to the press and the American public. She spined lies that were unbelievable. Finally the FBI told us the truth. She lied!
She can not be trusted with classified material ever again! Never. But Clinton supporters can't see she is disqualified because of her own actions.
Since the thread is about the WP's unprecedented editorial about Mr. Trump, would it be too much to ask that we discuss the WP's editorial about Mr. Trump?
Could you discuss which criticisms of Mr Trump you find unsound, and explain why?
Last edited by Goose (7/23/2016 9:10 pm)
Offline
Goose wrote:
Common Sense wrote:
tennyson wrote:
His supporters won't care from what I have seen.
No you are mixed up a bit tennyson....
It's the Clinton supporters who are so blind that they do not see that Clinton has disqualified herself from serving as president after she for years put our national security at risk by placing highly classified materiel on her home brew server. And then when confronted with this she lied time after time after time for over a year to the press and the American public. She spined lies that were unbelievable. Finally the FBI told us the truth. She lied!
She can not be trusted with classified material ever again! Never. But Clinton supporters can't see she is disqualified because of her own actions.Since the thread is about the WP's unprecedented editorial about Mr. Trump, would it be too much to ask that we discuss the WP's editorial about Mr. Trump?
Could you discuss which criticisms of Mr Trump you find unsound, and explain why?
I rather doubt you will get any discussion on what points are not sound in the article which pretty much validates my original statement.
Offline
Common Sense wrote:
Nothing but babble from the elites of the Washington Post who have made very clear that they will do anything to destroy Trump's run for president. They have assigned 20 reporters to spin vile stories when ever and how ever they can. All you will get from the Post will be biased stories for one purpose destroy at all cost. Trump! Guess what no one cares what the post prints. Their credibility is zilch!
TRUMP 2016
Unfortunately for your position as stated Common Sense, it's not just the Washinton Post, it's a wide array of many newspapers throughout the country and the world including groups like AP, Reuters, and others.
Can they all be biased and wrong? I don't think so.
Offline
It's the populist way. Rather than address any criticisms point by point with reasoning, appeal to emotion. Shout down any criticism with labels like "babble", and "the elites". Allege conspiracies. "THEYwill do anything" .Give the strongman a heroic persona. "I am your voice" against those awful elites. Them vs US.
Maybe they can ban newspapers altogether once the strongman takes over.
Last edited by Goose (7/24/2016 7:47 am)