1 of 1
Offline
Under fire after secret meeting, Lynch to step back from Clinton probe
Under bipartisan fire following a private meeting with former President Clinton even as her Justice Department investigates Hillary Clinton over her secret email server, Attorney General Loretta Lynch will announce on Friday that she will defer to non-political subordinates on whether to bring charges against the likely Democratic presidential nominee.
The Justice Department had been planning on such a course for months, The New York Times reported, but reports that Lynch met with the former president on her government plane at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport have sealed the decision.
Although Lynch claims the two discussed golf and grandchildren, legal watchdogs have called the meeting highly improper and called for the Department of Justice’s Inspector General to investigate.“Determinations as to whether to charge any individual, as well as the findings of the investigation, will be made by career prosecutors and investigators who have been handling this matter since its inception,” a Justice Department official told Fox News.
The source said Lynch will accept the determinations and findings of non-political appointees as well as FBI investigators and FBI Director James Comey. It is up to the FBI to recommend to proecutors whether to bring charges, but no timetable has been announced. Despite the approach of the Democratic National Convention, Comey has said the priority is to be thorough and fair.
Critics, including Republicans and some Democrats, said the meeting compromised the independence of the ongoing FBI investigation. Lynch plans to announce her plan at a conference in Aspen, Colo.The FBI is probing whether Clinton or her aides violated the law by setting up a private email server for her to conduct government business while serving as President Obama’s Secretary of State. More than 2,000 emails that passed through the server have been deemed top secret, which could represent a violation of the federal Espionage Act. In addition, as many as three foreign governments may have hacked the server, according to reports.
Lynch defended the chat with the former president, who appointed her as U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, as a cordial meeting between old friends.“He did come over and say hello, and speak to my husband and myself, and talk about his grandchildren and his travels and things like that,” Lynch said at a news conference in Los Angeles on Wednesday, where she was promoting community policing. “That was the extent of that. And no discussions were held into any cases or things like that.”
Critics were not convinced, and pointed out that rules governing Lynch’s conduct prohibit even creating the appearance of impropriety.“In light of the apparent conflicts of interest, I have called repeatedly on Attorney General Lynch to appoint a special counsel to ensure the investigation is as far from politics as possible,” Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said.James Comey, a Republican with a strong reputation for independence and even-handedness, could wrap up a year-long probe soon by recommending to the Department of Justice whether or not to pursue an indictment.
Offline
A wise move taking this out of the political realm.
It's the right thing to do. Probably removing the Benghazi probe from the partisan hacks in the House would have been wise also?
Offline
This is the newest "outrageous" incident perpetrated by Fox 'news'. It seems that since the marathon Benghazi hearings and the ongoing investigation of Hillary's e-mails have failed to provide any factual proof of wrongdoing that would land her in prison, the talking heads at Fox have resorted (once again) to conspiracy theories, innuendo, and rumor to cast aspersions against her candidacy.
The attorney general did the right thing to avoid the perception of any collusion with ex-president Clinton and Lynch on behalf of his wife. It appears she did not want an innocent conversation with a colleague/acquaintance explode into a full blown tabloid hit job.
But, I doubt that will stop the vaunted 'news reporters' at Fox.
Offline
At best, the meeting was "incredibly bad judgment" and it was "foolish to create such optics".
Maybe it was an innocent conversation, but you can clearly see why so many people don't trust the Clintons. They always seem to get themselves into these "innocent" situations where they want people to believe they didn't do anything. You would think seasoned politicians such as the Clintons would know to avoid those type of optics if they really aren't doing anything wrong.
Offline
Oh no... Justice seems to be back tracking now!
NEWS: Key clarification from DOJ official re what plans to say today (v diff than lede):
Last edited by Common Sense (7/01/2016 9:52 am)
Offline
This from ABC news:
ABC’s RICK KLEIN: What the heck were they thinking? Maybe they weren’t – and that’s the problem, of course. At the very least, the fact that a private meeting occurred between Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton was the product of a series of major errors in judgment. The former president and his team made a massive political error – an utterly unforced one – in not realizing how such an encounter, even a brief one, would be perceived in the summer of an election year. The attorney general and her team miscalculated the optics and perhaps the legality of the situation in allowing any such discussion, when everyone knows the FBI in the midst of an investigation of Hillary Clinton’s handling of her emails. Lynch’s announcement that she would defer to the FBI’s recommendations on the case doesn’t resolve anything. (In what scenario would it have been alright for her to insert her judgment for the FBI’s?) Donald Trump gets a new and powerful talking point. Bill Clinton again shows how his immense value can easily be outweighed in the other direction. And Clinton campaign staffers in Brooklyn have every right to be as upset with all of this as career prosecutors in Washington.
Offline
Another unforced, dumb error by the Clinton related to the e-mail issue.
Although if you think about it, I'm not sure Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch would need to come across each other on a tarmac to talk to one another.
Offline
This is the nail in the coffin. Hillary will lose for sure !
1 of 1