Offline
San Jose Mayor Justifies Mob Violence
Thousands of Americans participated in that most benign of civic rituals in San Jose, California, on Thursday night: seeing a presidential candidate speak. Of course, that candidate was Donald Trump, so as these engaged citizens streamed out of the arena, they were subjected to astonishing levels of violence.
An angry mob pelted eggs, tomatoes, and bottles at the spectators—as well as the police, who tried (and failed) to maintain some semblance of order. Other Trump supporters were set upon and punched. One was left with blood streaming down his face. The mayor of San Jose, Democrat Sam Liccardo, reacted angrily to the events.
Not that he was particularly upset at the violent mob that attacked innocent Americans, of course. No, his ire was directed at Mr. Trump. "At some point Donald Trump needs to take responsibility for the irresponsible behavior of his campaign," the mayor said. Apparently it was downright "irresponsible" of Trump to even set foot in California's third largest city.
The Washington Post characterized the mayor's remarks as if they were just standard partisan hackery: It noted that the mayor is a "Hillary Clinton supporter." But Liccardo's remarks were far different than, say, a cable TV flack claiming that Trump's tax policy "favors the rich." (And by the way, he employed the same logic as as a slack-jawed misogynist saying of a sexual assault victim, "hey, her skirt was so short, she was asking for it.")
Mayor Liccardo justified committing violence against people with whom he disagrees politically. That's an attack on the very foundation of our system of government and the First Amendment, and a very dangerous one.
Offline
I don't see that he justified violence.
He chose to put the blame on trump.
Offline
I do not agree with the idea of laying this at Trump's feet but I'm not seeing where the mayor 'justified committing violence'.
He said no such thing.
Offline
What the Mayor correctly asserted is that while in the US there is freedom of speech there is not freedom from the consequences of that same free speech. Mr Trump free-rolling insults on women, minorities, reporters, etc was sure to provoke outrage. That it rose to violence becomes a police issue which is where is needs to be handled . But to think that Mr Trump is just an unwitting participant in all of this is ridiculous.