Common Sense wrote:

Goose wrote:

Hey, CS, what relevance do emails have to topic of the thread?

Hey Goose,
Your comment at the start of this thread was"It is a disgrace"

and I responded with  "The TRUE disgrace is a Presidential candidate. Hillary Clinton who is under an active FBI criminal investigation.  Has there ever been a time when a candidate for president is being investigated by the FBI while running for office? Shameful conduct that placed over 2000 classified e-mail on a unclassified server!"

It's very relevant. Guess disgrace is in the eye of the beholder?     Words vs actions

Like you have said many times. Politics is a full contact sport and the voters will decide what's proper or not.

 
I thought we weren't going to to the whole personal thing anymore.

It wasn't relevant because the thread was about Donald Trump and his conduct.
To pivot onto Clinton's email was innappropriate.
If you support Trump's conduct on the campaign, then support it in this thread, and start another, if you like, on Clinton's emails.

Last edited by Goose (5/09/2016 8:53 am)

Just Fred wrote:

I have a solution:  Start a thread kicking around the pros and cons of Hillary Clinton's emails.  I'd do it myself, but I really don't think anything will come of it.  She was sending emails around that were retroactively classified as 'secret'.  Is that about right?

 
That's about it. Yet you have some folks carrying on like she was Ethel Rosenberg.
Tell me what that has to do with my kid's future.
It is just an attempt to drive up negatives. Does not help the country a bit.

But, by all means, someone should start a(nother) thread about Clinton's emails for those interested in discussing it.

Last edited by Goose (5/09/2016 9:53 am)