Offline
The CEO of Verizon makes almost $20 million a year in compensation. He leads one of the most profitable companies in the country.
Yet Verizon wants to take away employees' health benefits. Verizon wants to outsource decent-paying jobs. Verizon wants to avoid paying federal income tax. And right now, Verizon is refusing to sit down and negotiate a fair contract with its employees.
In other words, Verizon is just another major American corporation trying to destroy the lives of working Americans. But this time, Verizon's employees are fighting back.
Thousands of very brave employees of Verizon and Verizon Wireless are on strike until they can get a fair contract. They made a very difficult decision that puts their families at risk -- but it's a choice they made to stand up for justice against corporate greed.
Last edited by Just Fred (4/21/2016 7:47 pm)
Offline
It is called contract negotiations. In reading articles about this Verizon strike, they said they need to make adjustments to rising healthcare costs and expenses. I guess the ACA didn't lower costs as they promised, which isn't surprising. I saw an article about a major health insurer dropping out of the exchanges next year, which will increase costs even more.
By the way, I think Bernie laid on the hyperbole a little thick when he said they were trying to destroy the lives of working Americans. No, they are trying to make their company more profitable and control costs, which is the point of business.
The workers on strike are from the Verizon landline business (cable and traditional phones), which has been a declining business for them and all telecommunication companies in recent years. The vast majority of Verizon's profits come from their wireless division, which is not on strike. I think it is reasonable that Verizon look to trim costs for a section of their business that is barely profitable and quickly shinking.
Last edited by Brady Bunch (4/21/2016 8:15 pm)
Offline
Brady Bunch wrote:
It is called contract negotiations. In reading articles about this Verizon strike, they said they need to make adjustments to rising healthcare costs and expenses. I guess the ACA didn't lower costs as they promised, which isn't surprising. I saw an article about a major health insurer dropping out of the exchanges next year, which will increase costs even more.
By the way, I think Bernie laid on the hyperbole a little thick when he said they were trying to destroy the lives of working Americans. No, they are trying to make their company more profitable and control costs, which is the point of business.
The workers on strike are from the Verizon landline business (cable and traditional phones), which has been a declining business for them and all telecommunication companies in recent years. The vast majority of Verizon's profits come from their wireless division, which is not on strike. I think it is reasonable that Verizon look to trim costs for a section of their business that is barely profitable and quickly shinking.
Here is an article that talks about that.
Last edited by tennyson (4/21/2016 8:22 pm)
Offline
Brady. Regarding the ACA; Medicare part D was a disaster in the first six years.
Costs to recipients were staggering and premiums were no where near what they were saying they would be.
That program had serious problems but it's improved dramatically.
I believe the ACA will eventually do what it was meant to do.