Offline
It is absolutely shameful the way this state is currently being run.
RED LION, Pa. -
A York County school district may have to file for bankruptcy, because there is no state budget.
The Red Lion School District says it may file for bankruptcy. The district says it is missing $9.7 million in state money from its 2015-2016 budget.
They say they would use that money for building maintenance, like roof repairs. Red Lion is also withholding vendor payments to cyber and charter schools.
The district’s business manager says she has even been paying some of the district’s bills late in order to try to avoid bankruptcy.
Copyright 2016 by WGAL All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Offline
Write Wagner, Saylor, and Wolf and ask what they are personally going to do concerning the budget to make sure this doesn't happen.
Stan Saylor is having a town hall meeting at Springettsbury township building Wednesday, March 9. Show up in person and ask him what his plan forward is on agreeing to and approving last year's budget and making sure this year's budget is agreed to and passed on time to avoid these problems. Saylor is chairman of the house education committee, believe it or not.
The meeting will be on March 9 from 7:00-9:00pm at the Springettsbury Township building, 1501 Mount Zion Road.
Last edited by Rongone (3/07/2016 7:40 pm)
Offline
Unfortunately, this it the type of story that will be needed to push the legislators and governor to complete the 15-16 budget. After the Governor line-itemed the budget, little movement has been made on a final budget.
Offline
I was curious just what happens IF a school actually goes bankrupt. Here is what I found FWIW.
Unlike a business that is faced with tough times, a school district cannot close its doors and turn away kids, said David Davare, director of research services at the Pennsylvania School Boards Association.
Any school that can no longer afford to operate goes under state control, much like Act 47 for distressed municipalities, Davare said.
Under state control the Department of Education appoints a board of control, which supersedes the local school board and looks for long-term fixes to improve finances, Davare said.
Last edited by tennyson (3/07/2016 9:34 pm)
Offline
My first thought after reading these posts is so what if the school district files bankruptcy and a state dept. of education takes over control of it. There still is a shortage of money, there is still no state budget so from where does the money the state will need after it takes control?
Offline
flowergirl wrote:
My first thought after reading these posts is so what if the school district files bankruptcy and a state dept. of education takes over control of it. There still is a shortage of money, there is still no state budget so from where does the money the state will need after it takes control?
Not quite sure how the whole thing would work legally in terms of the lack of budget. I do not believe that money because of the lack of budget has in general been kept from flowing IN to the state coffers from things like taxes on gasoline, sales taxes, etc , but the reverse is the problem. What has been authorized thus far is then the question of how that money could be used by the State to finance any bankrupt district. Obviously this whole thing will have to come to a head soon.
Offline
tennyson found the key to this issue:
"Any school that can no longer afford to operate goes under state control, much like Act 47 for distressed municipalities, Davare said."
I think this story is a scare tactic that a school district may go bankrupt. It puts more pressure on Harrisburg to get something done. The school board would never file for bankruptcy because they lose local control of the school system because a state board would take control.
It looks like the funds that have not been given to Red Lion would have been used for maintenance/vendor costs.
"They say they would use that money for building maintenance, like roof repairs. Red Lion is also withholding vendor payments to cyber and charter schools."
I think Governor Wolf needs to drop his demand for tax increases this year. I don't see anyway that will happen in an election year.
Offline
I'm not completely up to speed on all of this, but I have just one question ................ why should a public school be responsible for subsidizing privately run cyber and charter schools?
Offline
Just Fred wrote:
I'm not completely up to speed on all of this, but I have just one question ................ why should a public school be responsible for subsidizing privately run cyber and charter schools?
Students from within a public school district that opt to attend a charter school take their cost per student with them to the charter school. The theory is that the portion of taxes etc. collected by the public school district on a per student basis should transfer with that student since the public school district does not have that student attending classes in the public school system. The legislature passed a law some time ago that required the public school district transfer the calculated per student cost to the charter Scool for each student that opted out of the public school system to the charter school on a monthly basis.
This is one of the reasons Scott Wagner made the $50k contribution to Thacker Charter school . . . York school district was withholding payments to charter schools due to the financial crisis they are facing due to the budget stalemate.
Offline
"I think Governor Wolf needs to drop his demand for tax increases this year. I don't see anyway that will happen in an election year.". Common Sense
No . . . The state senate, the state house, and the governor's office have to sit down, act like adults, throw the partisanship, blaming, and deflection out the window and negotiate a reasonable budget FOR LAST YEAR, and then work on reaching an agreement for this year's budget. They ALL need to collaborate, cooperate, and compromise to get their jobs done for the benefit of the people of Pennsylvania. As far as being an election year, I advocate for voting all incumbents in the state senate and house up for re-election out of office for dereliction of duty and abdication of their constitutional responsibilities . . . regardless of their party affiliation.