Offline
Priebus: Contested convention is unlikely
Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus is disregarding the idea of a settling the GOP presidential nominee with a contested convention. "I think the odds of a contested convention are very small. I've been saying that for a long time," Priebus said Friday during an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity at the Conservative Political Action Conference.
"It’s a strategy people can use, but look, I would suggest that it's better to win races and accumulate delegates.” When pressed, Priebus estimated that there's an "85 or 90 percent" chance that a candidate garners enough delegates to clinch the nomination before the convention. The statements came a day after 2012 nominee Mitt Romney called on voters to stop front-runner Donald Trump from getting the GOP nomination, warning he would damage the party. Hannity characterized Romney's speech as laying out a strategy to ultimately deprive Trump of the 1,237-delegate threshold and take the nomination from him on the convention floor.
Romney's call came in the shadow of a "#NeverTrump" movement by operatives and super-PACs to build interest in stopping Trump any way they can. Priebus shied away from talking about those efforts. But he had a message to those clamoring for a contested convention: slow down. “A lot of this is early talk. There are 1,237 delegates needed to be the nominee of our party. There are 1,744 delegates left to be distributed. We have a long way to go," he said. "Everyone's talking about Ohio and Florida, but between now and that day, 14.5 percent of the delegates are left to be distributed.”
Offline
That it is being tossed around at all as a solution is a telling sign of just how fractured the GOP currently finds itself.
Even more sad is the fact that most of the contenders publicly call the current leader Trump a liar (and worse) and then turn around and then say they would endorse "the liar" if he gets the nomination. There is something really wrong with the whole thing.
Offline
I am at a loss to understand the other candidates vowing to endorse a liar, bigot, racist for our president. Is winning that important?
Offline
I think the "fracture" is coming from the establishment side. They are in panic mode because one of their hand picked boys won't make it through the primary's. So sad!
Offline
Common Sense wrote:
I think the "fracture" is coming from the establishment side. They are in panic mode because one of their hand picked boys won't make it through the primary's. So sad!
Their "hand picked boys" haven't done so well in the General elections.
So the panic is because while their party might actually win the White House, the good old establishment boys would not be in line for patronage jobs in the Cabinet, etc.
I'm not shedding any tears for them.
Offline
Tarnation I am with you 100%! And so are most of the (R) primary voters
Offline
Tarnation wrote:
Common Sense wrote:
I think the "fracture" is coming from the establishment side. They are in panic mode because one of their hand picked boys won't make it through the primary's. So sad!
Their "hand picked boys" haven't done so well in the General elections.
So the panic is because while their party might actually win the White House, the good old establishment boys would not be in line for patronage jobs in the Cabinet, etc.
I'm not shedding any tears for them.
On the highly unlikely situation that Trump might win the Presidency, do you really think he will fill his cabinet jobs with other than establishment individuals ? My guess is the chances are slim to none.