Goose wrote:

tennyson wrote:

Let's not turn this into yet another pissing contest or a personal back and forth. It is both tiring and telling of character. 

I agree.
Acting like I don't have a right to participate in the discussion is a bit much.

And so is accusing people of putting on an 'act' when they ask legitimate questions that they genuinely want answers to.  Knock it off goose.
 

The Man wrote:

Goose wrote:

The Man wrote:

 
Who's acting? I asked a question, and I wasn't asking you. Why butt in?

1. It's a public forum. So, by definition, I'm not "butting in".
2. You said that you didn't know that Trump employed illegals in response to a post that I made.
​3. Yes, it actually IS documented.

Why the ignorant act?
Why acting like it's odd that I should respond?

Anyway, now you know.

 
Where's the documents? Do you have a legitimate source?

I already posted one.
You ignored it.

The Man wrote:

Goose wrote:

The Man wrote:

 
Where's the documents? Do you have a legitimate source?

I already posted one.
You ignored it.

 
I didn't ignore it. I said legitimate source.

It was a legitimate source.

The Man wrote:

Goose wrote:

The Man wrote:

 
I didn't ignore it. I said legitimate source.

It was a legitimate source.

 
Politifact.com? No it wasn't.

Search the internet. Trump's trouble with the undocumented Polish workers was widely reported.
And that is just the tip of it.
Do some work.
I'm sure you'd accept something negative about Clinton with much less documentaion.
 

I like how Trump deals with the media.  After the most recent republican debate, Bill O'Reilly interviewed Trump and asked something to the effect of 'Do you get annoyed with the questions that we ask you?'  Trump said 'No, not really'.  O'Reilly said 'Well it seems to me like you do'.  Trump said 'Well I think you should talk to your psychiatrist about that'.

LOL!  It is entertaining at least.  None of these canned responses like all of the other candidates give.