Offline
ly to help the syste]
But in the absence of technical and legal protections, technology is upturning those presumptions.
“Now we have a surveillance-enabled world,” Ms. Granick said. “It’s cheap, and it’s easy. The question that society has to ask is, Is that what we really want?”
htte=c-column-middle-span-region®ion=c-column-middle-span-region&WT.nav=c-column-middle-span-region
Last edited by Goose (3/04/2016 9:46 pm)
Offline
Michael Hayden , a retired United States Air Force four-star general and former Director of the National Security Agency, Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence, and Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. On July 1, 2008, Hayden retired from the Air Force after over 41 years of service and continued to serve as Director of the CIA until 12 February 2009.
Had an interview on Fox News. He said there is more than one appropriate way to look at this, and more than one valid interest in opposition. But his primary interest is national security, and he believes America is more secure when Americans have strong encryption and it may make us less secure to hack the IPhone. It is his opinion this should not be done.
Hopefully they will get video/transcript soon.
Offline
Offline
Just a little background on this. It is not as if Apple has never complied in helping the government hack into one of their iPhones. It has happened a number of times already. It is based upon the government using the All Writs Act. I am not defending the All Writs Act or arguing against it, but rather pointing out that Apple in specific (along with other tech companies) had acquiesced to helping law enforcement in previous cases.
Offline
BTW, almost the same issue is right now coming up in England.
UK police could hack phones and browse Internet records
Last edited by tennyson (3/01/2016 5:00 pm)