Offline
This Time, Cheaper Oil Does Little for the U.S. Economy
WASHINGTON — It has been a truism of the American economy for decades: When oil prices rise, the economy suffers; when they fall, growth improves.
But the decline of oil prices over the last two years has failed to deliver the usual economic benefits.
As oil prices have fallen to levels not seen since 2003 — sagging below $27 a barrel on Wednesday before rebounding to about $30 on Thursday — many experts now say they do not expect lower prices to bolster the domestic economy significantly in 2016.
“We got this wrong,” John C. Williams, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, told an audience in Santa Barbara, Calif., this month.
Lower oil prices historically were a cause for celebration in the developed world, including the United States. The effect was akin to a tax cut for consumers who could fill their gas tanks for less money. And since much of that oil was imported, the windfall was generally larger than the damage to domestic oil producers.
Every dollar gained by consumers was a dollar lost by producers, but when the dollars were lost by foreign producers, the American economy should have benefited.
But this time is different. The losses from lower prices are larger and quicker than expected as energy companies cut back on investment and lay off workers, while the gains are smaller and slower to materialize, as consumers save some of their windfalls.
Economists at JPMorgan Chase, who predicted last January that lower oil prices would add about 0.7 of a percentage point to the economic growth rate in 2015, now estimate that lower prices might have shaved 0.3 of a percentage point off the growth rate.
This year, JPMorgan predicts that lower prices will help expand economic activity by just 0.1 of a percentage point, while economists at Goldman Sachs said they expected an impact “around zero.”
The decline of oil prices is causing other problems, too. It has contributed to the correction in global equity markets; the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index is down 10 percent this year. And lower prices are weighing on inflation, jeopardizing the Federal Reserve’s plans to raise interest rates by about one percentage point this year.
Continue reading the main story
Offline
Then the question arises, Would it be better economically for the American public to have higher gas prices when the global economy is slowing ? I think not. We certainly would be much worse off if gas prices stayed where they were.
We pay way too much attention to gas prices. The reason it seems to attract so much attention is that it is one of the things (food included) that we need to purchase on typically a weekly basis or so.
Offline
Lower gas prices have been great for us all but not particularly outstanding for those who drive little and are battling higher prices for other goods. As an added note--I do not see any prices being lower because the manufacturers'/ producers'/ retailers' fuel costs are much lower.
Offline
Here is what lower fuel prices do for my personal economy: Gas is now half the price of its all time $3.99/gallon high. Using about 30 gallons/week for the vehicles, that means we have about $60.00/week more in discretionary cash than any time in recent memory.
We're eating out more. We're doing some "get a round to it" home repairs that are bigger than DIY. Is that helping the local economy? You betcha.