Offline
I watched it for awhile, but got so depressed about living in America today, I thought about jumping out a window and ending it all. I mean if you listened to these guys, our economy is in the toilet, our military has been gutted, we have no credibility in the world, our healthcare system is a mess, we have no foreign policy, nobody is afraid of us, jobs are gone, there's no hope for the younger generation, diplomacy is for chumps, people without guns can't protect themselves and risk an ISIS attack, the stock market is taking a dump, taxes are too high, etc. Did I miss anything?
In the end, the only choice we have is to elect people who hate government to show us how the nation's government should be run.
Offline
I just watched the excerpts on the news this morning. It did seem like a dreary affair. Extremely petty and beside the point of the issues we face.
Where is the vision?
Offline
Here is a pretty damning assessment that appeared in Forbes Magazine today.
Donald Trump Loses A Terrible GOP Debate
John Zogby
Donald Trump is master of the one liner and the angry rhetoric. But there was some vulnerability tonight.
Actually we all lost the GOP debate Thursday night. The event went a full 71 minutes before any substance was discussed. We suffered embarrassing exchanges between Donald Trump and Ted Cruz on natural born citizenship. That one lasted far too long but Cruz got the better of it. He dismissed Trump’s charges as false and came back with a previously unknown fact that Trump’s mother was Scottish and a better known fact that Trump never raised the “birther” issue on Cruz until the polls between the two actually tightened. A stupid rejoinder to a stupid issue. Judging by the audience’s response, Trump received a lot of boos on this one. Point for Cruz.
The second bout of stupidity was an exchange between Marco Rubio and Chris Christie. To be fair, a candidate cannot always control what one of its support PACs say in a commercial, but Rubio honestly supported the charges that Christie was an Obama-like liberal because he allegedly “wrote a check for Planned Parenthood” as well as supported gun control and Common Core. Christie was able to deftly dismiss these charges and the factual record is on Christie’s side.
Donald Trump did not like the comments made earlier in the week by South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley who warned against anger by admitting he “likes Nikki but I am angry about the mess we are in.” And Cruz scored against Trump again by reminding the audience that Trump once supported gun control because “I am from New York” – neither the position nor the geography things that play well in South Carolina.
Silly stuff. Goofy to be sure. But then the debate moved to some substance and the candidates performed a lot better.
All the candidates got a fair amount of time because only seven of them were on the stage. All stated conservative positions adequately but there were some substantial differences in demeanor (the angry vs. the steady) and policy. Here is how I see the results based solely on who I can picture as a GOP President.
Chris Christie: The New Jersey governor was the winner. He emerges as the leader of the establishment and a forceful representative of the moderate, conservative establishment. He has a successful alternative governance model to consider.
John Kasich: He got the chance to state and restate his successful experience in both Congress and in Ohio. He, like Christie, has a solid mantra about making government work for people and a force for good.
Jeb Bush: This was his best debate and moment. He came off as the steady hand and as a reminder that anger is not a platform. He stood up to Trump’s comments on banning all Muslims by offering a more reasonable policy of tweaking the US vetting policy for refugees.
Ted Cruz: Cruz scored a lot of points and is the leader of the conservative wing. He is a seasoned debater and made Trump look like a minor league bench warmer by reminding him (and everybody else) that he argued for the Constitution at the Supreme Court for many years.
Marco Rubio: Rubio was eloquent and focused as usual but we are getting closer to voters casting a ballot but he took his hits in this debate. He effectively went after Cruz and held his ground on defense. But Cruz wounded him too. Are either of them ready to really be President of the United States?
Donald Trump: The GOP frontrunner is master of the one liner and the angry rhetoric. No doubt he has support but he got a lot of boos and hisses tonight. Corporate raider Carl Icahn as a negotiator for the United States against China? Angry voters are also angry against Wall Street, too. I am not sure what happens in the polls. I am sure he has a lot of support among those who want to punch someone – especially a public servant – in the nose. But there was some vulnerability tonight.
Ben Carson: Carson fading in the polls because there is just no there there.
Offline
Why watch the debate when there are entertaining little ditties like this highlighting everything you need to know about this campaign:
Adorable, aren't they?
Offline
You nailed it, Fred. Additionally, I became so weary of hearing how Obama guts "the Congress, the Senate" (Trump); how he undermines the 2nd Amendment; "takes rights away; closing hospital wards" (Kasich); how "Hillary, Kerry and the president made the country weak" (Bush); Kasich (again & again) telling all the great things he's responsible for in Ohio, etc.; where someone's brother, sister, aunt, uncle, mother was born; the Democrats will bring a lawsuit against Cruz birth; and lastly, "Kick your (Obama's) rear end out of the White Office this fall," (Christie) forgetting I guess his presidency ends! Nary a word of how any of the candidates intend to make the country great again, as if it needs it, even though each one thinks he is going to make the country great again. Ben Carson makes no sense at all.
Offline
The interesting dichotomy of the debates and the campaign in general seems to be in order to achieve unity, we must first divide the people into categories with vitriolic rhetoric.
I guess that makes for a stronger country . . . at least in the candidates' demented, twisted, feeble minds.
Offline
Why watch the debate when there are entertaining little ditties like this highlighting everything you need to know about this campaign.
Holy crap, rongone! I'm assuming this was real. If it was, take a minute and count the number of minorities and young people you see in the crowd behind the stage.
Last edited by Just Fred (1/15/2016 11:16 am)
Offline
Just Fred wrote:
Why watch the debate when there are entertaining little ditties like this highlighting everything you need to know about this campaign.
Holy crap, rongone! I'm assuming this was real. If it was, take a minute and count the number of minorities and young people you see in the crowd behind the stage.
That's real Fred. Those young girls are known as the 'freedom kids' and the Trump campaign contacted them to kick off that campaign event. Obviously, with all the trappings of the event, the participants fit the mold of the people he's pandering to.
Offline
The press is going through the dreary exercise of deciding who "won" the debate.
That question is entirely beside the point.
Who got in the best zingers about Canadian birth or a Scottish mother?
Who cares?
This is how to pick a president?