1 2 Jump to
Offline
First of all, no one said that the man in the photo was armed. It was said that he is part of an armed group that seized those buildings.
Secondly, we know that the man in the second photo was unarmed because after the photo was taken he was searched for a weapon.
The point here is actually quite obvious. A bunch of armed guys violate the law and there are no consequences.
In another situation the police swarm all over people.
People are rightfully asking, Why?
I hope that I have explained my point of view to you understanding
Offline
Common Sense wrote:
Rongone wrote:
In my opinion, there is nothing that these open carry, pseudo militia, anti-government, bunker prepper, false patriotic nincompoops want more than an armed confrontation with legal authorities. Somewhere in their defective cro-magnum brains, they envision a shootout with the police, FBI, National Guard, U.S. Marshals, Seal Team 6, or whoever will somehow justify their illegal actions and make some point about how the government is infringing upon their rights. To me, that illogic premise and incomprehensible conclusion to their thinking shows nothing more than how far from reason these jerks have wandered.
I'd like to see the legal authorities surround the property, let no one in or out, completely isolate these bozos and see how long they can fend for themselves without the luxuries or basic essentials to which they are accustomed. Then, when they slink out, one by one or a couple at a time, arrest them, throw them in jail with the other lawbreakers, and make them all liable for paying off the total cost of the government operation necessary to keep the peace. And, if one of these mental defects fires one shot in 'defense of their principles', I'd give them 12 hours to surrender or suffer the consequences of an all out assault of government troops on the compound.Maybe if you called then a few more choice names it would help make your point?
Key Board courage... Easy to assault from a key board? Just saying....
I'm pretty sure I clearly stated my opinion as to the character of these upstanding examples of real 'mericans. Maybe if I merely called them 'pinheads' some people would more readily agree with my assessment of these illegal occupiers of federal property. And that, my friend, is my point -- these people are ILLEGALLY occupying buildings and space that belongs to someone other than themselves. They are breaking the law and should be treated as criminals. Keyboard courage . . . Sorry, but I'm unfamiliar with that term. And I firmly stand behind my comment as to what should happen to these criminals if any one of them decides to prove a point by firing a weapon at law enforcement or civilians on the scene. 12 hours to surrender or suffer the consequences of an all out legal assault on these criminals by legal authorities.
What would you do to solve this problem of illegal armed occupation?
1 2 Jump to