1 of 1
Offline
Freddie Gray Trial: Famous Pathologist Vincent Di Maio terms death an accident
“It’s just an accident,” he said, “and accidents happen.”
[quote888]Dr. Vincent Di Maio, a forensic pathologist and former chief medical examiner in San Antonio, said Gray’s injury was “so violent, it’s so high-energy,” that it would have immediately caused Gray to lose control of his body and his diaphragm, which is critical for breathing and speaking.“This has all the appearances of a single catastrophic injury,” he said.Gray could not have suffered his severe spinal cord, then, at the fourth stop of the van in which he was injured, when Porter found him on the floor of the van and Gray allegedly asked for help, said he couldn’t breathe and said he needed a medic.The injury had essentially “cut off the head from the body” in a neurological sense, Di Maio testified. He said Gray’s spinal cord was 80 percent crushed. “You had a head and a body and they were disconnected,” he said. “You aren’t feeling anything. You aren’t able to move. He was paralyzed. He was quadriplegic.”
Dr. Di Maio went on to characterize the injury as an “accident,” and not a “homicide”:
[quote888]Di Maio said he believed Gray was injured between the fifth and sixth stops, and that his death was not a homicide as state medical examiner Dr. Carol Allan found, but an accident.“It’s just an accident,” he said, “and accidents happen.”
On cross-examination by the prosecution, Dr. Di Maio was adamant that Gray would have been unable to speak after the injury (meaning that Gray could not have already suffered his injury at the stop at which he asked Porter for help):
[quote888][Prosecutor] Schatzow pointed out that Gray’s spinal cord was not 100 percent cut, and questioned whether Di Maio was sure that Gray would not have been able to speak at the fourth stop in which he talked with Porter.“Impossible?” Schatzow asked.“Yes sir,” Di Maio said.“Completely impossible,” Schatzow asked.“Yes, sir.”
[/quote888]
[/quote888]
[/quote888]
Offline
Could not delete the quotes?
Offline
So a guy had a high energy injury that crushed his spinal cord during a routine transport in which the van experienced no crash. And it was an accident? High energy injuries cannot be intentional?
What was the event? As I said, the van didn't crash.
BTW, you do realize that the "famous pathologist" is employed by the defense? You failed to include that fact in your post.
Here's my line of thought. I am not willing to take this man's statement that it was an accident as the final word in this for two reasons.
1. He is employed by the defense. He wouldn't be in that courtroom if he was going to say anything else.
2. Another pathologist, one working for the state says it was a homocide.
For those two reasons, I'm going to have to hear this pathologist's entire argument and judge whether it makes sense. (As will the jury). Perhaps the article just isn't written very well. But, I just don't see how the fact that this was a high energy injury proves that it was an accident. I gotta hear more.
Last edited by Goose (12/09/2015 2:39 pm)
Offline
"BTW, you do realize that the "famous pathologist" is employed by the defense? You failed to include that fact in your post."
Well first do you think the prosecutor is going to call him? I don't think so!
I knew he was called by the defense.
That is why the LINK is there so you can read the full post!
Offline
No problem
I'm sure it was an honest omission on your part.
What did you think about the doctor?
You do understand why this testimony may not be definitive?
Last edited by Goose (12/10/2015 5:43 am)
1 of 1