Offline
It's really worth the read. A letter from Elizabeth Warren to Donald Trump:
Offline
If Liz "Fauxcahontas" Warren actually has a chance to become the new face of the Democrat party, they've really got problems. She's as likeable as a bag of poopy dropped on your front porch.
Last edited by The Man (11/17/2016 7:16 pm)
Offline
Let's give her a cutesy put down.
Much easier than considering what points she may raise.
Actually, Warren is quite popular in progressive circles. If you are in the fact based community, you will have to acknowledge that.
"Poopy"?
That's really thoughtful and mature.
Looks like misogyny is alive and well.
Last edited by Goose (11/17/2016 6:48 pm)
Offline
I'm going to actually read warrens remarks and comment later.
Crazy, I know!
Offline
Goose wrote:
I'm going to actually read warrens remarks and comment later.
Crazy, I know!
I already read her remarks, that's why I commented. Funny, you admit that you haven't read her remarks, and yet you claim that my comments are wrong and "misogynist." So now any negative opinion about a woman to you is misogynist? That about right?
Offline
The only people who will drain the swamp are US - the voters. In terms of making appointments, both sides tend to rely on the ones that are (or have been) in power positions. The notion of "draining the swamp" was pretty much political theater. That said, some of his potential choices and a few already made are REALLY not good. There are still many to be made and we will see what type (if there is a pattern) arises.
At least Liz is pointing out the hypocrisy of his statement.
Last edited by tennyson (11/17/2016 7:22 pm)
Offline
The Man wrote:
Goose wrote:
I'm going to actually read warrens remarks and comment later.
Crazy, I know!
I already read her remarks, that's why I commented. Funny, you admit that you haven't read her remarks, and yet you claim that my comments are wrong and "misogynist." So now any negative opinion about a woman to you is misogynist? That about right?
If you read her remarks, why didn't you respond to her remarks?
Hey, I would have confined my post to warren's remarks.
But, if All you have is misogyny and scatological taunts, you might as well go with it.
Go with your strength, buddy.
Last edited by Goose (11/17/2016 7:22 pm)
Offline
Goose wrote:
The Man wrote:
Goose wrote:
I'm going to actually read warrens remarks and comment later.
Crazy, I know!
I already read her remarks, that's why I commented. Funny, you admit that you haven't read her remarks, and yet you claim that my comments are wrong and "misogynist." So now any negative opinion about a woman to you is misogynist? That about right?If you read her remarks, why didn't you respond to her remarks?
Hey, I would have confined my post to warren's remarks.
But, if All you have is misogyny and scatological taunts, you might as well go with it.
Go with your strength, buddy.
Please stop derailing the thread. Get back on topic. Read her remarks, then comment. Thank you.
Offline
Ok, I'm curious. I've read the letter 3 times, complete with the footnote references. What part of the letter or information she cites do you take issue with?
Offline
The Man wrote
If Liz "Fauxcahontas" Warren actually has a chance to become the new face of the Democrat party, they've really got problems. She's as likeable as a bag of poopy dropped on your front porch.
OK, you don't like Warren.
Why? I don't know, and frankly I don't care.
The thread is not a referendum on Elizabeth Warren.
It is about a letter she authored regarding the emerging Trump team.
Please discuss that. With, or without the puerile insults and scatalogical imagery, as you see fit.
Last edited by Goose (11/18/2016 6:16 am)