The New Exchange

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

2/11/2015 2:20 pm  #1

Beer Fight!

Bud Ad Sparks Beer Fight in Congress

When Budweiser ran a snarky ad about craft beer on Super Bowl Sunday they had no idea they had picked a fight in very high places.

Washington, DC – Budweiser may have to host the next Beer Summit in Washington, because they’ve accidentally pissed off lawmakers in both parties.

While Budweiser thought it was just sticking a finger in the eye of, shall we say, experimental beer fans nationwide with its Super Bowl commercial mocking local craft brewing artisans and aficionados alike, they seem to have forgotten that the craft beer industry has a lot of allies in Congress.  

The ad – “Brewed the Hard Way” – disses crafty concoctions, even calling out Pumpkin Peach Ale by name, and declares pride in macro brewing for people who don’t want to “fuss over” silly little details, like the actual taste of their beer.  

But to politicians who are falling over themselves to attract the creative energy, votes and small dollar donations sitting largely untapped at their local breweries - the ad was personal.

"I think it's insane,” said Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.), a co-chair of the House Small Brewers Caucus. “I don't think it's the right approach."

Beer seems to be taking a note from politics (God, help us all). After Budweiser dropped its multi-million dollar attack ad, craft beer lovers started throwing their own sudsy blows at Big Beer. Lots of them. But politicians seem to be rallying around the little guy, who they say was provoked by Budweiser.

“It’s like the first political attack ad on this thing, so like the politics of beer,” said McHenry, the craft loving congressman who represents a whopping 25 small breweries in his Asheville, N.C. district.  

Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) missed the feisty Budweiser ad because he watched the Super Bowl in a “chaotic environment,” but that didn’t mean he wasn’t willing to tear it down.

“They know that the craft beer industry is eating their lunch,” the animated founder of the Small Brewers Caucus yelled. “More and more Americans are developing a taste for beer that isn’t insipid and has real taste, and so they’re now starting to buy them up.”


DeFazio’s anger is partly due to recently watching 10 Barrel Brewing Co. of Bend, Ore. become another local operation added to the binder full of craft breweries acquired by Anheuser-Busch InBev – a Belgium-based company that looks to be picking off the most successful American craft breweries one by one.

The conglomerate boasts being the largest brewer in the world and claims to now control 25% of global beer sales. They couldn’t have reached a quarter of international beer sales without scooping up craft breweries in the U.S. though, which DeFazio said starkly contrasts with their Super Bowl message.  

“So it kind of contradicts their ad. I mean, they’re trying to say, ‘Oh, come on back and buy the schlock,’ yet on the other hand, they’re out buying up the good beer,” DeFazio said, before he added a warning. “They better not change the formula’s cause people will just stop buying it and someone else will replace them.”  

Less than 72 hours after the Budweiser ad unleashed the anger of craft beer fans, Sens. Ben Cardin (D-Md.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) reintroduced their legislation aimed at propping up the craft beer industry: The Small BREW Act, which stands for The Small Brewer Reinvestment and Expanding Workforce Act.

“It’s like the first political attack ad on this thing, so like the politics of beer,” said Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-NC).
The legislation seeks to foster small breweries, i.e. local jobs and votes, through dropping the tax rate per barrel from $7.00 to $3.50 for the first 60,000 barrels a brewery churns out. It would then save small breweries an additional $2.00 on every barrel until they hit the magical 2 million number. The big boys and girls aren’t invited to the dance though; any macro brewery churning out more than 6 million barrels is excluded from the new rates. Sen. Cardin said it’s a simple idea.

“I don’t think we ever intended for small businesses to be burdened with an excise tax, such as the beer tax,” Cardin said. “When we’re talking about a craft brew industry that is generally supporting small business and encouraging a new generation of people who really appreciate the art of brewing beer.”

A quarter of the Senate have signed onto the BREW Act, but Big Beer isn’t sitting this fight out. Within 24 hours of the introduction of the BREW Act, a pair of U.S. House members dropped The Fair BEER - Brewers Excise and Economic Relief – Act. It removes taxes for the first 7,143 barrels and then basically extends the Small BREW Act to Big Beer.

“This comprehensive reform bill supports brewpubs, microbrewers, national craft brewers, major brewers, and importers alike and encourages their entrepreneurial spirit, which is exactly the spirit we need to get America’s economic engine going again,”  Rep. Steve Womack (R-Ark.), an original sponsor of the BEER Act, said in a statement.  

Chris Thorne, a lobbyist for Washington’s Beer Institute, called me to tout the BEER Act.

His group boasts that it represents Big and Craft beers alike, but it draws a line in the sand on the BEER vs. BREW Acts debate. It won’t take tax relief for small brewers unless Big Beer gets a slice of the pie too.

“It allows members of Congress to support every part of the industry. They can stand with the microbrewers, the national craft brewers and major brewers and importers,” Thorne said. “They’re not being asked to pick winners or losers in the marketplace.”

Thorne said it’s not about the breweries themselves - it’s really about blue collar vs. white collar drinkers.

“You’re really talking about people who pave roads, lay dry wall, wire houses, deliver washing machines, do landscaping; they’re the ones paying for the light beer and the Mexican imports and they’re the ones paying the top of the dollar,” Thorne said before brushing aside craft beer fans as wealthy elitists. “And some chucklehead who’s making $150,000 a year could put down $50 or $45 bucks for a case of beer he’s a paying a much smaller tax.”

While the BEER Act enjoys 21 cosponsors in the House, in the last Congress the BREW Act was signed onto by 181 House members.

The math is simple for Senator Cardin.

“It’s not even a beer issue, it’s a small business issue,” he said while dismissing the BEER Act.  

As for the Budweiser ad itself? Cardin happily leaves his craft beer snobbery aside on that point. “Actually I liked the ad,” Cardin said. “Of all the ads, I thought that one was pretty clever. So I liked it.”   

For other lawmakers the Budweiser ad is more complicated.

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) represents Missouri – home to both Budweiser and a burgeoning craft brewing scene (think Schlafly and their Pumpkin Ale…).

“I heard that there were problems and, you know, I don’t want to take sides,” said McCaskill who doesn’t want to take sides. “I’ve got an awful lot of breweries in my state that I support besides Anheuser-Busch, so I don’t want to get in the middle of that fight.”

Full disclosure: this was written while sipping craft beer. To be fair to Anheuser-Busch InBev, one of them was a deliciously punchy IPA from Goose Island Beer Company – a Chicago brewery InBev scooped up in 2011. This Goose Island’s for you, Budweiser!

Matt Laslo is a veteran congressional reporter. In his free time he hosts Bills and Brews; a craft beer and politics show. Find him on Twitter @MattLaslo.

Last edited by Goose (2/11/2015 2:22 pm)

We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 

2/11/2015 4:48 pm  #2

Re: Beer Fight!

Ha! I had forgotten about that ad! I did see it during the Super Bowl and remember thinking that it was on the nasty side. Then I thought that craft breweries must be affecting the big guys' bottom lines, or they would just ignore them. So there is that.
As far as Congress getting involved in the beer industry with tax breaks and such, I say stay out of it! The taxes didn't stop all those small breweries from going into business in the first place, so just keep the tax the tax for all of them and focus on other things. I do not think there are really any small craft breweries that are trying to take on Bud, etc. If they were, they would be churning out bottles of cheap colored water too. 


2/11/2015 6:55 pm  #3

Re: Beer Fight!

What's ironic is that while they lambast the craft beer market in their ad, Anheuser-Busch (and also MillerCoors) have recently been buying up small microbreweries left and right, so that they can get a foothold in that rapidly rising market.

In any case, it strikes me as a pointless ad - the hardcore microbrew enthusiasts aren't going to be touching Budweiser anyway, and the Budweiser diehards are going to turn up their noses at fancy expensive beers. Or in other words, they spent millions out of their advertising budget just to play a message that most already know anyway


2/11/2015 7:09 pm  #4

Re: Beer Fight!

I agree Max Power. Nothing like spending millions on basically pointless advertising. It's pretty sad that's the best they could come up with for a Super Bowl ad. Sounds like somebody should be shopping for a new advertising dept. exec.


2/11/2015 8:51 pm  #5

Re: Beer Fight!

Then I thought that craft breweries must be affecting the big guys' bottom lines, or they would just ignore them. So there is that.

Spot on. In 1988, Budweiser sold 50 million barrels. Today, it's 16 million. Nothing to sneeze at but definitely not what it once was.

I could say a lot about that commercial Bud ran during the Super Bowl. On the one hand, it was insulting to anyone who doesn't want to drink light tasteless swill. On the other hand, it was a nice piece of marketing geared to those young people just getting into drinking. The commerical asked a simple question:

Do you want to be a berded hipster sniffing beer with other bearded hipsters?

Or do you want to sit at a rockin' bar with babes and big breasted waitresses bringing you one Bud after another?

I thought the funniest aspect of the commercial is when the writing on the screen says, "Let them have thier Peach Pumpkin Ale"

A week before the Super Bowl, Anhueser-Busch purchased a small craft brewery out of Oregon called Elysian. 

What does Elysian brew????

Finally, here was a great response to the Bud commercial from another Pacific Northwest brewery, Ninkansi


I think you're going to see a lot of different United States of America over the next three, four, or eight years. - President Donald J. Trump

2/12/2015 7:59 am  #6

Re: Beer Fight!

Ha, ha, ha, ha!  Well, if Budweiser brewed a better beer they wouldn't have this problem, no?  Anyway, here's a hoot for you: In Europe, Bud is touted because it's an import!

Anyway, for all you beer lovers, may I suggest Belhaven's Scottish Ale (the draught in a 14.5 oz. can especially).  The draught has one of those little packets that pops when you open it and dispenses nitrogen ............. makes for a real smooth texture and head.  At 60 bucks/case it's one of those you savor once in awhile on a special occasion like sitting out on your deck on the first day this year when the temp hits 60.


2/12/2015 8:25 am  #7

Re: Beer Fight!

"You can put lipstick on a beer ....."  (well, you know the rest!) 

"Do not confuse motion and progress, A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress"

2/12/2015 9:59 am  #8

Re: Beer Fight!

 1988, Budweiser sold 50 million barrels. Today, it's 16 million. -Lager

That explains a whole hell of a lot! They're subscribing to the pathetic business model of "don't make your product better, just trash the competition's."
That response ad was pretty awesome. I wish they could air it nationally!

And that Belhaven's Scottish Ale sounds mighty good, I'll have to try it! Of course, anything my fellow Scots make is superb. (o.k., except maybe haggis)

Last edited by BYOB (2/12/2015 10:04 am)


2/12/2015 10:55 am  #9

Re: Beer Fight!

That explains a whole hell of a lot! They're subscribing to the pathetic business model of "don't make your product better, just trash the competition's."

The thing about it, is it's not like Budweiser is a "bad" product. It's a standard lager brewed with rice. It's been around a long time and to be honest, a lot of work does go into making it from the perspective of having to make millions of gallons of it, in different breweries, and have every bottle of it look and taste the same.

It's actually quite a feat, in terms of getting the ingrediants and chemistry exactly right.

I just think it's a shame that Bud, rather than ecouraging the growth of the beer industry as a whole, decides to spit on it.

I think you're going to see a lot of different United States of America over the next three, four, or eight years. - President Donald J. Trump

2/12/2015 11:27 am  #10

Re: Beer Fight!

You are right about it being a feat to ensure volume and consistency. Although, to be honest, Bud is not anywhere near the top of my beer list. I just never liked it. To me it was always just the beer you used to get drunk if that was your goal, and not if you wanted beer for taste and the pleasure of drinking an alcoholic beverage. I'm right there with ya on the spitting on vs. encouragement thing. I've never sat well with the idea that I have to make yours look bad in order to make mine look better.

Speaking of beverages, I recently saw The Big Lebowski for the first time. Why oh why did I wait so long to see it?!  Jeff Bridges has always been one of my favorite actors. I think I'm going to have to add it to the personal movie collection and have a Lebowski movie night guessed it - White Russians, while staring at my area rug in the living room thinking about how it ties the whole room together. 


Board footera


Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum