The New Exchange

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



12/16/2017 9:37 am  #1


Now They are Banning Words

Censorship reflects a regime's lack of confidence in itself.
The only way that their world view can prevail is to remove all other world views.




The Trump administration reportedly wants 7 words and phrases banned at the CDC

The words "vulnerable," "entitlement," and "diversity" were among seven terms and phrases reportedly banned from use in some official documents at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Documents related to federal budget proposals that contained those words were sent back to the agency for "correction," according to the CDC's Alison Kelly. She told The Washington Post that four other banned words and phrases — "transgender," "fetus," "evidence-based," and "science-based" — were communicated verbally.

Policy analysts at the agency were given those instructions during a meeting on Thursday, The Post said, citing people who were there.

The CDC, along with other federal agencies, submits its budget proposals to the Office of Management and Budget. The OMB has jurisdiction over the proposals, but it was not immediately clear whether anyone at the OMB had specifically requested that those words and phrases be banned. The OMB did not immediately respond to Business Insider's request for comment Friday night.

The Trump administration in its early days quickly scrubbed information related to LGBTQ people from the Health and Human Services website, and the Associated Press reported in March that the US Census Bureau would not include a category for LGBTQ people in its proposal for the 2020 census.

And just days after President Donald Trump's inauguration, Reuters reported that his administration told the Environmental Protection Agency to remove mentions of climate change from its website. Trump has previously made clear his personal doubts about climate change, at points insisting it's an "expensive hoax." The president's views on the matter helped inform his decision to withdraw the US from the Paris Agreement on climate change in June.

Since taking office, the Trump administration has not been coy about its ideologically conservative principles, or its intention to govern accordingly. Observers reacted to the allegedly banned words on social media Friday night, calling the reported directive "Orwellian" and "dangerous." Dictionary.com capitalized on the moment by defining the word, "vulnerable" on Twitter.

"Also vulnerable: Language," it said.

https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/12/16/the-trump-administration-reportedly-wants-7-words-and-phrases-banned-at-the-cdc/23309292/

Last edited by Goose (12/16/2017 9:38 am)


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
 

12/16/2017 12:35 pm  #2


Re: Now They are Banning Words

Next up ... book burnings ! 


"Do not confuse motion and progress, A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress"
 
 

12/16/2017 3:28 pm  #3


Re: Now They are Banning Words

They laughed when I compared Trump to the fascists of the 1930s,,,,,,,,,,,
 


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
     Thread Starter
 

12/18/2017 5:54 am  #4


Re: Now They are Banning Words

E.P.A. Employees Spoke Out. Then Came Scrutiny of Their Email.


WASHINGTON — One Environmental Protection Agency employee spoke up at a private lunch held near the agency headquarters, saying she feared the nation might be headed toward an “environmental catastrophe.” Another staff member, from Seattle, sent a letter to Scott Pruitt, the E.P.A. administrator, raising similar concerns about the direction of the agency. A third, from Philadelphia, went to a rally where he protested against agency budget cuts.

Three different agency employees, in different jobs, from three different cities, but each encountered a similar outcome: Federal records show that within a matter of days, requests were submitted for copies of emails written by them that mentioned either Mr. Pruitt or President Trump, or any communication with Democrats in Congress that might have been critical of the agency.

The requests came from a Virginia-based lawyer working with America Rising, a Republican campaign research group that specializes in helping party candidates and conservative groups find damaging information on political rivals, and which, in this case, was looking for information that could undermine employees who had criticized the E.P.A.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/17/us/politics/epa-pruitt-media-monitoring.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
     Thread Starter
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum