Offline
Goose wrote:
Common Sense wrote:
tennyson wrote:
I thought the unlawful citizens stood out pretty clearly.
THIS ++++++
Fred you really can not tell who the lawful citizens are?
Hint... they are not burning down something, assulting police, looting, wrecking police cars, throwing rocks!
just a few.....
How about breaking necks?
How about breaking necks? Who broke a neck??
Give me a few details........
Offline
Goose wrote:
How do you define bullshit?
Because I for one don't think this is it.
So I guess it's 'we all' - 1
She instructed her police to allow people space to destroy if they wish, and that's what her police force did. It's on video/audio, plain as day, you can't misconstrue that. Then, later, she tries to spin that plain as day statement to mean something else. Bullshit.
If you don't understand that, you're a little slow.
Offline
Common Sense wrote:
Goose wrote:
Common Sense wrote:
THIS ++++++
Fred you really can not tell who the lawful citizens are?
Hint... they are not burning down something, assulting police, looting, wrecking police cars, throwing rocks!
just a few.....
How about breaking necks?How about breaking necks? Who broke a neck??
Give me a few details........
The Baltimore PD
Offline
Goose wrote:
Common Sense wrote:
Goose wrote:
How about breaking necks?How about breaking necks? Who broke a neck??
Give me a few details........
The Baltimore PD
How do you know that? Were they proven guilty? Is it impossible that Gray could have broken his own neck?
Offline
Yea, the necks of perfectly healthy 27 year olds just snap all the time. It was just a coincidence that he was taken into custody at the same time by police.
BTW, you don't have to define bullshit for me anymore. I've just seen a great example
Offline
Goose wrote:
Yea, the necks of perfectly healthy 27 year olds just snap all the time. It was just a coincidence that he was taken into custody at the same time by police.
BTW, you don't have to define bullshit for me anymore. I've just seen a great example
You're the one claiming that you have proof that the Baltimore PD killed this guy. Why not share your proof?
Talk about bullshit. Lol!
Offline
Fred you really can not tell who the lawful citizens are?
Hint... they are not burning down something, assulting police, looting, wrecking police cars, throwing rocks!
just a few...
I think my point zoomed past you. Perhaps I should clarify. My point has do with how do you identify people and/or criminals before they make the choice to become criminals. All people are law-aiding citizens before they make the choice not to be. I don't know how it is possible to identify a law-breaker until they break the law.
We all can identify a lawful citizen if they've broken no laws. But, a citizen who respects the law today can become a problem tomorrow. The key is to find solutions to the problems that trigger unlawful behavior.
You've got to stop focusing on the symptoms of civil unrest and instead, determine the causes and focus on that. Sending in a massive police force to quell a disturbance is a temporary band-aid, not a solution.
Last edited by Just Fred (4/28/2015 1:15 pm)
Offline
Geez-o-man. A guy was taken into custody, put in a van with policemen, and exits the van with a broken neck/severed spinal cord, and some say, "Well, there's no proof of police brutality?"
Ok.
Offline
Just Fred wrote:
Geez-o-man. A guy was taken into custody, put in a van with policemen, and exits the van with a broken neck/severed spinal cord, and some say, "Well, there's no proof of police brutality?"
Ok.
Yep, we've entered the twilight zone.
Nothing to see here. Necks just snap all the time.
Unbelievable.
Offline
The Man wrote:
Goose wrote:
How do you define bullshit?
Because I for one don't think this is it.
So I guess it's 'we all' - 1
She instructed her police to allow people space to destroy if they wish, and that's what her police force did. It's on video/audio, plain as day, you can't misconstrue that. Then, later, she tries to spin that plain as day statement to mean something else. Bullshit.
If you don't understand that, you're a little slow.
On the new Exchange we are attempting to stay on the high road of discussion.
I'd ask you to not label whatever you disagree with as "BS",
And to refrain from suggesting that people who disagree with you are stupid.
Intelligent people can and do disagree
Thanks.