The New Exchange

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



12/31/2016 7:14 am  #1


No, Media, the Election Wasn’t ‘Hacked’ — Stop Saying It Was

No, Media, the Election Wasn’t ‘Hacked’ — Stop Saying It Was

http://heatst.com/politics/media-election-hacked/

When President Obama announced Thursday he was taking retaliatory measures against Russia for its role in cyber-attacks against Democratic Party institutions, the mainstream media pounced.

They listened to the Obama administration describe Russia’s “aggressive harassment,” “malicious cyber activity” and “data disclosure activities,” and quickly seized upon an ominous phrase: “election hacking.” Election hacking took off so fast that the narrative needed an attendant and drink cart accompanying it.

To be perfectly clear, there is zero evidence of actual election hacking, such as the hacking of voting machines, paper ballots or voter fraud on the part of Russia in an effort to install Donald Trump into the White House. There’s no evidence Russia employed a massive cloaking device from a secret submarine in Lake Erie, over the state of Wisconsin, where Hillary Clinton did not campaign once during the general election.There’s no evidence Russia influenced Clinton campaign operatives to steer SEIU members on the ground away from Michigan.

As of yet, there is no proof it was Russia who directed Lena Dunham to campaign in North Carolina, or the aged cast of the West Wing to stump in Ohio. There is no evidence that rural voters in Pennsylvania, whom Mrs. Clinton ignored in the final weeks of the campaign, are actually Russian spies. It is still not known whether Katy Perry is in fact a Russian agent.If any actual electoral fraud was engineered by Putin and Russia, giving Hillary Clinton almost 3,000,000 more votes than Donald Trump is an amazing cover.But again, none of this occurred on the day Americans went to the polls. The word “hacked,” or variations thereof, does not appear inthe White House statementand only once, prefaced by “allegedly” in the DHS statement. There is no evidence of any illicit activities occurring on Election Day.

John Podesta was hacked. The election was not. Podesta’s emails were stolen, not via some sophisticated cyber operation, but through a common email phishing scam, the same ones your grandparents fall for when you catch them writing a big check to that wonderfully nice and thankful Nigerian prince.

There was no forced breach of information, or Russian agents hanging from ceilings at Langley, or stealing files from offices late at night . No one broke into the DNC and stole discs in a daring midnight raid. The information was given willfully and ignorantly by Podesta and his staff. They are the ones responsible.If the illegal attainment of leaked information is considered “hacking the election,” then file the 2012 election under being hacked as well.
 


 “We hold these truths to be self-evident,”  former vice president Biden said during a campaign event in Texas on Monday. "All men and women created by — you know, you know, the thing.”

 
 

12/31/2016 7:20 am  #2


Re: No, Media, the Election Wasn’t ‘Hacked’ — Stop Saying It Was

I'm not sure what the author of this hit piece is so worked up about.
Actually, the media has been very good at pointing out that there is no evidence that vote totals were inaccurate, or fraudulent.

Trump, as you recall, was the only person to say that the vote totals were fraudulent.

The media has been accurate in reporting that the Russians Hacked the DNC, and used what information they had to hurt democrats and elect Donald Trump.

Last edited by Goose (12/31/2016 7:21 am)


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
 

12/31/2016 8:52 am  #3


Re: No, Media, the Election Wasn’t ‘Hacked’ — Stop Saying It Was

I question the website itself.  It doesn't appear to be a reputable 'news' outlet.  I see no reason not to pursue an investigation of this to clear up any questionable behavior by a foreign government messing with our future elections.  It's important.  BTW, I'd feel the same way if the shoe were on the other foot and Clinton was elected.

 

12/31/2016 9:09 am  #4


Re: No, Media, the Election Wasn’t ‘Hacked’ — Stop Saying It Was

It's just another example of a straw man argument.
The media is NOT alleging that voting machines were hacked by Russia, or that paper ballots were tampered with.
But, the author pretends that the media did something they didn't do, and proceeds to condemn that thing which did not happen.


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
 

12/31/2016 9:33 am  #5


Re: No, Media, the Election Wasn’t ‘Hacked’ — Stop Saying It Was

....the author pretends that the media did something they didn't do, and proceeds to condemn that thing which did not happen.  -  Goose

It's a classic propaganda technique:  Mis-characterize something or someone then attack the mis-characterization.

 

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum