Conspiracy Theory wrote:

Curious if the people protesting on the left will continue to do so all the way through his presidency?

Kinda like the people on the right did?

I understand people call themselves adults.

I see no reason to conclude that it will be any different

Pointing out violence from sore losers is gloating? Pointing out name calling and insults is gloating? Do you start to understand why she lost the election? The left loves to criticize the electoral college when their side loses. Clinton didn't get 50% of the vote either.

Unfortunately Fred the media was so against him that his basic policy statements hardly ever got out. There are now links to what he expects to do in his first 100 days. I don't particularly like celebrities  and I consider Trump a self centered blow hard, but I like his basic policy statements and there is almost nothing I like about Hillary. One thing I liked about Trump, he blamed the political class, in other words, both parties for the mess we're in. Even with a Republican congress it remains to be seen whether he'll be able to work with them.

As far as the riots, I'm hearing that many are being caused by Soros paid agitators. Trump has reached out to unite all American's, unlike Obama with his 'we won get over it speech'. It does no good to wish him to fail as it was no good for certain Republicans to oppose Obama just because they didn't like him.

As far as the riots, I'm hearing that many are being caused by Soros paid agitators.

What's source and proof of that?  I'm not questioning what you heard only asking for some evidence.

I'm not buying the media was against him.  I don't consider reporting what he said as 'being against him'.  That's like saying, "Don't blame me for the things I say or do."  Trump tweeted and said weird and hurtful stuff 24/7 for months.

It was his choice not to make the campaign about issues, specific plans and solutions, and rationale for his positions on those issues.  Unfortunately, the dopey Clinton campaign managers thought they would play the same game and got sucked into the rabbit hole.
 

Last edited by Just Fred (11/11/2016 11:40 am)

Just Fred wrote:

As far as the riots, I'm hearing that many are being caused by Soros paid agitators.

What's source and proof of that?  I'm not questioning what you heard only asking for some evidence.

I'm not buying the media was against him.  I don't consider reporting what he said as 'being against him'.  That's like saying, "Don't blame me for the things I say or do."  Trump tweeted and said weird and hurtful stuff 24/7 for months.

It was his choice not to make the campaign about issues, specific plans and solutions, and rationale for his positions on those issues.  Unfortunately, the dopey Clinton campaign managers thought they would play the same game and got sucked into the rabbit hole.
 

http://magafeed.com/paid-george-soros-agitators-answer-coalition-are-behind-the-trump-protests-happening-nationwide/

http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/03/31/craigslist-ad-offers-protesters-15-hour-crash-wisconsin-donald-trump-rally

This link mentions Soro's
http://www.inquisitr.com/3707564/post-election-riots-are-anti-trump-demonstrators-being-paid-to-violently-protest/

How can you possibly say the media wasn't against him when 90% of the stories and articles were biased against him. Whether he deserved  the heat or not, the vast majority of the media was against him and his supporters. I wish I had a nickle for every time I heard or read, racist, sexist, Islamopho, etc.

Goose wrote:

What is ignoring violence done by the winners called, Tim?
Paid agitators? "I'm hearing "?
Well, that sure seems solid. Certainly not a delusion that goes perfectly with your own bias. LOL

Your team better get up to speed

what violence are you talking about Goose? Maybe this?
http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/10/hillary-supporters-assault-white-trump-supporter-video/
Never mind, that video is a couple of black thugs beating up an older white guy because they thought he supported Trump.

Maybe this one?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3930834/Trump-supporters-attack-Wilson-Eschevarria-Anthony-Hobdy-arrested-Connecticut-New-York-police-hunt-suspect-choked-subway-passenger.html
Nope, another assault on a Trump supporter.

Hopefully this one.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/11/high-school-students-laugh-as-girl-gets-attacked-for-allegedly-supporting-trump/
Nope, white girl assaulted by blacks for supporting Trump.

Ah, this is the one you mean
https://thinkprogress.org/islamophobia-two-days-since-election-c4e20bc4c18c#.314weprg2

Yep, that was picked up real quick by the press and I know I read about it in the paper. Notice the hate crime remark, something I didn't see in the links of Trump supporters being attacked. But there's more.......
http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/10/student-admits-she-made-up-attack-by-trump-supporters/
What do you know, she made up the story. I've read a few other reports of racial assaults on minorities being proven false. Of course it's obvious, but I guess you need me to say it. Insults and violence should be rejected by both sides.

Haters come in all forms - Right wing / Left wing 

Haters exist in EVERY community. 

Haters ARE going to hate. 

Don't pretend it is just one side or the other.

It wasn't me who started the racist hater name calling, ask Fred. Trump supporters have been called that more times than I can count, so when real hate and violence from your side is pointed out, don't excuse it by saying both sides do it.

Trump winning actually ramped up the hate right here in York which made the National News. 

This just about a month after the West York debacle again made York a loser city from a National news standpoint. 


 

Last edited by tennyson (11/14/2016 10:55 am)