Offline
Want to understand the bubble in which the elite, liberal media lives?
Check out the banner headline of today’s New York Times:
“Democrats, Students and Foreign Allies Face the Reality of a Trump Presidency.”
On today’s Morning Joe, Mark Halperin nailed it: “Look at the headline of this story. This is the day after a surprising underdog sweeping victory and their headline is not “disaffected Americans have a champion going to the White House” or “the country votes for fundamental change.”
Scarborough also reported that Halperin and Nate Silver had been savaged by leading-but-unnamed MSM reporters and major news anchors for asserting—not that Trump would win—but that he even had a chance to win.
The headline is about how disappointed the friends of the people who run the New York Times are about what’s happened.
Scarborough also reported that Halperin and Nate Silver had been savaged by leading-but-unnamed MSM reporters and major news anchors for asserting—not that Trump would win—but that he even had a chance to win.
Offline
Shouldn't you guys be making america great or something?
Last time I checked, the election was over.
Was this all about hating the press?
Time to get to work on healthcare, infrastructure, security, the wall (snicker), the heroin epidemic,,,,,,
Let's see some ideas
Last edited by Goose (11/10/2016 9:47 am)
Offline
Remember that is looks like more people voted for Clinton than Trump. He most certainly IS our new President, but it is not that he has a national mandate. If HE ignores that, America will NOT be Great Again as he promised. There is work to be done for America and BOTH sides need to understand that.
Offline
tennyson wrote:
Remember that is looks like more people voted for Clinton than Trump. He most certainly IS our new President, but it is not that he has a national mandate. If HE ignores that, America will NOT be Great Again as he promised. There is work to be done for America and BOTH sides need to understand that.
Yea, Donald might want to tell Gingrich that referring to the opposition as "whining. sniveling cowards" isn't exactly the way to build bridges.
Get past this assault on the MSM, whatever that is, and get going for god's sake.
Last edited by Goose (11/10/2016 9:58 am)
Offline
legalinsurrection.com. ?
Seriously ? . . . A blog that subscribes to the notion that overthrow of the government utilizing violence is a reasonable solution to problems.
You've got to be kidding me. A conspiracy theorist website that relies on innuendo, half truths, outright lies, and unverified rumors to spread their propaganda.
I wouldn't use this website to build a reasonable base for any discussion. I think their petty jealousies about any established press or media outlets were the impetus for this latest tantrum.
Offline
Rongone wrote:
legalinsurrection.com. ?
Seriously ? . . . A blog that subscribes to the notion that overthrow of the government utilizing violence is a reasonable solution to problems.
You've got to be kidding me. A conspiracy theorist website that relies on innuendo, half truths, outright lies, and unverified rumors to spread their propaganda.
I wouldn't use this website to build a reasonable base for any discussion. I think their petty jealousies about any established press or media outlets were the impetus for this latest tantrum.
Yeah, it is kind of a laugher !
(Guess it would have been OK had Clinton won)
Last edited by tennyson (11/10/2016 11:03 am)