This forum is hosted for free by Boardhost. Create your own free forum!
- The Man
- Exchanger
Offline 
- Registered: 3/07/2015
- Posts: 779
Re: Where's Chris Hanson when you need him?
Goose wrote:
In other words you have nothing
It doesn't matter what I have. There is a connection between Clinton and Weiner, and Abedin. The FBI is investigating. If there's nothing there, why is anyone worried?In other words, the fact that an investigation is underway justifies any slurs you can imagine?
I thought that investigations were undertaken to determine facts. What you embrace is what they do in Putin's Russia. How interesting
Now you're just making things up. What slurs? The investigation is to determine facts. And why did you bring up Putin? What does he have to do with this?
- Goose
- Cogito ergo sum
Offline
- Registered: 1/29/2015
- Posts: 13,427
Re: Where's Chris Hanson when you need him?
You launched s very fanciful thread with a conclusion that was not supported by your own link.
Then you suggested that the mere fact that an investigation is occurring is evidence of some weird Clinton-Weiner sex scandal.
That's crazy.
And if you truly don't understand my reference to Russia I can't help you.
Last edited by Goose (11/03/2016 3:45 am)
We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists.
- Goose
- Cogito ergo sum
Offline
- Registered: 1/29/2015
- Posts: 13,427
Re: Where's Chris Hanson when you need him?
On Dec 16th Donald Trump will face charges in New York court over allegations of raping a 13 year old girl in 1994.
So Trump raped a child and he's never even been arrested or charged with a crime for it? Do you think that maybe this is a bogus claim? Just maybe?
Interesting thought.
It does beg the question, Why doesn't Hillary Clinton get the same accomodation?
Clinton has never been arrested or charged with a crime, and the FBI has been looking into her emails for over a year.
There were about 8 sets of Congressional Hearings about Benghazi. They produced zero arrests.
Therefore, "Do you think the claims about her are bogus? Just maybe ".
We should be consistent in our reasoning,
Don't you think? 
Mr. Trump seems to benefit from a double standard. The fact that he hasn't been arrested is cited here as evidence of innocence. But, when we get to Hillary, who has also not been arrested, the mere fact that an investigation has occurred is cited as evidence of guilt.
That just doesn't work.
Last edited by Goose (11/03/2016 4:17 am)
We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists.