Offline
when she is hanging with the rich and powerful.
Offline
Of course, a billionaire real estate mogul is the perfect advocate for the middle class.
Did John micek have problems with mitt and Donald about this?
Last edited by Goose (8/24/2016 5:53 pm)
Offline
Micek didn't say Trump was the perfect advocate for the middle class, he pointed out that it is hard to buy Clinton's claim that she is with her actions.
BTW, Micek's editorials generally have a very "liberal" leaning. He is not a supporter of Trump
Offline
Brady Bunch wrote:
Micek didn't say Trump was the perfect advocate for the middle class, he pointed out that it is hard to buy Clinton's claim that she is with her actions.
BTW, Micek's editorials generally have a very "liberal" leaning. He is not a supporter of Trump
Exactly. Besides, this thread isn't about Trump, let's keep it on topic. If someone wants to talk about Trump, there are a thousand Trump threads on here already in which you can do so,or you can start another new one.
Hillary is the kind of person who will tell someone like me, owning one 1500 sq.ft. house and driving one car that gets 35 mpg, that I need to do more to combat global warming, while she owns multiple mansions, flies in private jets and helicopters and owns multiple gas guzzling vehicles.
The woman is a joke. A hypocrite of the highest order.
Last edited by The Man (8/24/2016 6:34 pm)
Offline
Regardles of wealth I can always identify with Hilliary Clinton. She doesn't give the appearance of being wealthy like many others do--she's more like a Bernie Sanders or a Warren Buffet in my eyes neither of which flaunt their wealth. Donald Trump on the other hand--we all know what a blowhard he is.
Offline
FDR was great for the working man, and he was beyond rich.
The argument does not hold water
Last edited by Goose (8/24/2016 7:36 pm)
Offline
The Man wrote:
Hillary is the kind of person who will tell someone like me, owning one 1500 sq.ft. house and driving one car that gets 35 mpg, that I need to do more to combat global warming, while she owns multiple mansions, flies in private jets and helicopters and owns multiple gas guzzling vehicles.
.
I'm sure that it is emotionally satisfying to write that, but there is no evidence to support such a statement.
In fact, Clinton's positions have consistently supported protecting the middle class, and raising taxes on the very rich in order to fund programs that protect the poor, children, and the working class. Contrary to what The Man has written, it is Trump who supports breaks for the people who own multiple mansions, jets, etc.
Facts are stubborn things.
Last edited by Goose (8/24/2016 7:50 pm)
Offline
flowergirl wrote:
Regardles of wealth I can always identify with Hilliary Clinton. She doesn't give the appearance of being wealthy like many others do--she's more like a Bernie Sanders or a Warren Buffet in my eyes neither of which flaunt their wealth. Donald Trump on the other hand--we all know what a blowhard he is.
I appreciate your opinion flowergirl. People are going to have different views on this based on their worldview and perceptions, and I can respect that.
For me, I do not believe she is being sincere when she says she is fighting for the middle class. Between her ties to Wall Street with all the speeches she has made (and refuses to detail what she told them), the high priced fundraisers and the people who donated millions to the Clinton Foundation and appear to have received special access to the State Department, I don't buy what she is trying to sell.
Last edited by Brady Bunch (8/24/2016 7:15 pm)
Offline
But, she did release her tax returns.
Offline
I would say to simply compare the platforms of both tribes and support the one that best aligns with your perception of what's best for America, then vote for people from president on down that best reflexes your view. There's alot more at stake than POTUS.