1 of 1
Offline
Baltimore prosecutor's office should be investigated for Gray-related murder charge
Read the full editorial here:
The disturbing revelation by The Sun this weekend that Baltimore State's Attorney Marilyn Mosby or one of her prosecutors may have used a misleading summary of evidence to persuade a grand jury to indict the six Baltimore police officers charged in the death of Freddie Gray demands a formal investigation.
The cardinal duty of a prosecutor under the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct is to "refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause." At least as to the second degree murder charge against Officer Caesar Goodson Jr., there is ample reason to initiate an investigation in order to determine if that duty was violated.When Ms. Mosby announced the charges against the six officers at her press conference on May 1, 2015, it was the murder charge against Mr. Goodson that propelled Ms. Mosby to national prominence.
The charge also stunned legal experts. It now appears that Ms. Mosby never had evidence sufficient to prove that charge; Mr. Goodson, who was driving the police van in which Freddie Gray sustained a fatal spine injury last year, was acquitted of all charges against him last week.The evidence produced at Mr. Goodson's trial by Ms. Mosby's two deputies was so weak that it is not immediately apparent what facts would have formed the basis for an objectively reasonable prosecutor to conclude that it was likely that Mr. Goodson committed murder, which is the standard for determining probable cause. In that context, the testimony of Detective Dawnyell Taylor at Mr. Goodson's trial, claiming that a prosecutor lacked integrity and had ignored evidence in the case, and the contents of her notes impugning the integrity of the grand jury process, reported by The Sun on Sunday, make it imperative that the actions of Ms. Mosby and her attorneys leading up to the indictment of Mr. Goodson be reviewed.
There were warning signs of problems from the start. At her news conference a year ago, Ms. Mosby stated that she made her decision to file criminal charges against the officers based on an "independent" investigation done by her office rather than on the investigation conducted by the Baltimore Police Department (BPD); there is no comparison between the investigatory resources and experience of the two agencies. Ms. Mosby's statement that she was assisted in her investigation by the Baltimore City Sheriff's Office was also clouded by an affidavit submitted in a civil suit filed against her by Brian Rice, another officer charged in connection with Gray's death.
Major Samuel Cogen, the commander assigned by the sheriff to assist Ms. Mosby's office, stated that he was presented with a narrative to include on the statement of charges that he filed against the six officers, and that "the facts, information and legal conclusions contained within ... as well as the charges lodged against plaintiff came entirely from members of the state's attorney's office." Mr. Cogen claimed "no involvement in the investigation whatsoever."
READ the rest on line...
Offline
It was a malicious prosecution initiated to placate rioting thugs.
We are a democracy, not a mobocracy.
This is a textbook case of prosecutorial misconduct.
Offline
Officer Goodson was the van driver and the prosecution did not have the evidence sufficient to prove any charges against him.
So how are they going to prove any charges against the remaining officer's who played a much smaller role in Gray's arrest. The defense has filed for dismal of the charges. If that fails the States Attorney should drop the case. But I don't think that is likely because the prosecutor's office is backed into a corner.
Offline
They really should have gone with manslaughter.
No way in hell the had sufficient evidence for a murder claim.
The same thing happened in Florida who 'accidently' killed her toddler. The prosecution tried for capital murder...death sentence, and the jury felt that, while she was indeed culpable, there was not enough evidence for a death sentence.
I don't know what the hell prosecutors are thinking when they do things like this. They should prosecute for the crime, not based on public opinion.
1 of 1