Offline
Guns, Pancakes, and Ambiguity
A professor has second thoughts about writing a recommendation for a student gun enthusiast
Since I started teaching six years ago, I’ve become more interested in gray areas. Maybe it’s because dealing with students seems to highlight all the complex ways in which a simple plan can break down. I sometimes have fantasies about what it’s like to be that teacher who’s seen it all — the dude who came to the final exam inebriated, the student who offered sex for a grade change. What would it be like to take all of that in stride?
A recent incident in my classroom has me thinking about the ways in which the randomness of the universe is always sort of poking at us as educators.Growing up in Virginia, I belonged to a family with guns. They were used for hunting and trap shooting. I can’t remember ever not knowing where both the shotgun (a Browning over and under with the most lovely filigree you ever saw), and the rounds (little red tubes with shiny, cupped copper bottoms) were stored. They were in separate locations, as per standard gun-safety practices, but eventually they both disappeared. At some point my mother let it be known that she had gotten rid of them.
My father, you see, suffered from terrible manic-depressive episodes and my mother eventually had heard enough about the risk of suicide that she instituted gun control in our household. My father died of natural causes when I was in college and I always kind of quiver in my heart when I think about what my mother did. I’m glad I didn’t lose him earlier to suicide. To have known him less time than I did, which by now is less than half of my lived life, would have been hard. "Sarah" was a very nice young woman who turned up in one of my classes a year or so ago. Her academic abilities were not strong but she had great energy and was a class leader. Definitely a process, and not a content, type of gal. I did take special notice of her on the first day during a sharing activity we typically do at the beginning of my science lecture courses. Sarah shared that the most notable experience of her winter break was a visit to a gun range where she had fired an AK-47. I gave the usual "very good, moving on" response but was thinking, "Whoa, that’s disturbing."When I was in college, we had this thing called the Santa Shoot. At the end of the semester you could bring your old books and tests to the firing range and "take out your frustration."
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology had a championship shooting team at the time (late ‘90s) and the Santa Shoot was a great fund raiser. MIT had to stop it, though, because people were starting to bring pictures of their professors (and their girlfriends) on which to take out their frustrations. Like many things at MIT, it got a little weird — and dark. (I just checked though — now it’s a video game.)
Other students in my classes have mentioned machine guns and firing ranges. I work in what you might call a red-meat type of area. The National Rifle Association puts up a big billboard advertising its annual pancake breakfast in a lot just a block from our campus. Other billboards advertise local shooting ranges. In our small city, we have three different gun shops (not counting chain stores) and seven gun ranges all within a 20-minute drive from the campus. This is what people do in their free time here: guns and pancakes.
Welcome to America, professor. Later, when Sarah was a student in another one of my courses, I overheard her confiding that she was looking forward to getting her concealed-carry permit. (Disclosure: I don’t teach in Texas.) I hadn’t known we had such permits in our state but apparently we do. Or did. Students could legally come to the campus armed until recently, when our legislature banned weapons from all state university campuses.Last year at some point, Sarah said she was applying to a teacher-credential program and asked me for a recommendation. Initially I said yes because I usually do. I don’t know the exact date she asked, but I am thinking it must have been before the Umpqua Community College shooting last October because that’s when I really started thinking about students and guns.
After Umpqua, colleagues and others specifically asked me if I felt safe on the campus and I had to think about that question. Our college’s "shelter-in-place" drills — in which whole buildings practice for an active-shooter situation — have not made me feel safe. I also did not feel safe during a visit to the campus police station where I was offered a free gun-safety lock.
For a long time, Sarah didn’t follow up about the recommendation. Recently, however — with at least 14 more people dead and 17 more injured in college campus shootings — she emailed me again, updating me on her plans and repeating her request. I lay all of this out here now because I don’t know what to do about the recommendation.
It’s so complicated. On one side are all of my ideas about supporting students, honoring their individuality and their journeys, creating a safe space for them (and myself), not taking things out of context, not overinterpreting. On the other side are my memories of growing up in a situation where guns, people, and bullets had to be rigorously kept apart, lest they find each other in a tragic moment of instability.She seems to be a good kid, Sarah. And I don’t know what she really thinks of gun advocacy and political failures that have cost us all these lives and our sense of safety as educators. I don’t know what she does on the weekends. I also don’t know if she understands emotions, or what real rage feels like.
It seems to me no person who has truly experienced the full impact of their own emotions would ever go near a gun.So what do I do? Do I write her a recommendation because I originally said yes? Do I say no and explain myself? Do I ignore her email?Certainly my predicament raises the whole issue of what letters of recommendation mean. But this whole thing just feels so, so … so much like creeping up the attic stairs, unzipping the padded case and running my fingers over the tendrilled grooves etched into the barrel of that old Browning shotgun. Peering down the chamber, I didn’t know how to say it then, but tools for killing will always be sacred.How can I say that I don’t want to support students who are gun enthusiasts, without getting put on some sort of list? You know — Santa Shoot 2.0. I mean, she’s applying to a teacher-credential program, for God’s sake. I wish the way forward was more black and white to me — that I knew what to do in this situation. But I don’t.
Myrtle Lynn Payne is the pseudonym of an instructor in the sciences at a college in the western United States.
Offline
Unfortunately this article only seems to show up on sites that want to blame the teacher for her candid feelings which is unfortunate, but underscores the sad politics that surrounds this issue.
In the US today only about 1/3 of the population even own a gun according to current statistics, so it is understandable why many do not want or feel a need for a gun and even feel it to be more of a threat than a tool of protection either from their personal experiences (ie suicides, etc) or other.
I applaud the teacher for at least vocalizing her consternation over the issue and her feelings about it.
Offline
... many do not want or feel a need for a gun and even feel it to be more of a threat than a tool of protection either from their personal experiences (ie suicides, etc) or other. - Tennyson
Well, from this morning, here's a family who might want to re-think the need to have a gun for protection:
MILWAUKEE (AP) — Relatives say a woman was fatally shot in the back by her 2-year-old son as she drove in Milwaukee.
Antonio Price says investigators told him his sister Patrice was driving with her two sons, ages 1 and 2, riding in the backseat Tuesday when she was shot. Price says investigators told him the older boy fired the gun. He says his mother was in the passenger seat and was not struck.
Milwaukee County sheriff's officials haven't identified the victim, but say a 26-year-old woman was shot once in the back by a child sitting in the backseat.
Price says his sister was a great mother and always gave him good advice.
The woman's father, Andre Price, says his daughter was driving her boyfriend's car when she was shot.
Last edited by Just Fred (4/27/2016 9:36 am)
Offline
What you have is a wacky teacher who has decided that if a student wants to exercise her 2nd amendment right that there is probably something wrong with her. Never mind that the student has done nothing wrong!
Why would a teacher even question writing recommendation for a student because of the students stance on the 2nd amendment?
The wacky world that is a college education today!
Offline
Just Fred wrote:
... many do not want or feel a need for a gun and even feel it to be more of a threat than a tool of protection either from their personal experiences (ie suicides, etc) or other. - Tennyson
Well, from this morning, here's a family who might want to re-think the need to have a gun for protection:
MILWAUKEE (AP) — Relatives say a woman was fatally shot in the back by her 2-year-old son as she drove in Milwaukee.
Antonio Price says investigators told him his sister Patrice was driving with her two sons, ages 1 and 2, riding in the backseat Tuesday when she was shot. Price says investigators told him the older boy fired the gun. He says his mother was in the passenger seat and was not struck.
Milwaukee County sheriff's officials haven't identified the victim, but say a 26-year-old woman was shot once in the back by a child sitting in the backseat.
Price says his sister was a great mother and always gave him good advice.
The woman's father, Andre Price, says his daughter was driving her boyfriend's car when she was shot.
WHY WAS A LOADED WEAPON LEFT UNSECURED WHERE A TWO YEAR OLD COULD ACCESS IT?
Criminal behavior by adults!
Offline
Criminal behavior by adults!
Interesting. Who do you prosecute? What is the charge? What would be the appropriate penalty?
Offline
I don't see the teacher as whacky and I am a gun owner.
I understand that people can have deep seated feelings about things and question how that needs or needs not to interface with their other dealings. We have seen it on the religious side, so why not on this issue as well ?
The issue I see here is that any person applying for a job that has to get references it always behooves them as well as the person that is being requested for the reference to be straight forward if they can give the reference.
Offline
I am a gun owner and I see her as extremely wacky. That is why she is using pseudonym instead of her real name.
Offline
I don't think the professor is wacky, but an example of what is a major issue in this country, and that is the ability to understand where someone else may be coming from if it disagrees with their personal belief.
Instead of respecting the thoughts and opinions of someone who might not share the same thoughts as them, they think there is something "disturbing" or wrong with the other person. Just because the professor has come to the conclusion that they don't think there is a reason to be near a gun, doesn't mean other reasonable people may disagree.
It is apparent her personal history has formed her view on this subject, but having that impact others is the issue. I wonder how people would feel if this was a story about a gay student asking for a recommendation but the professor refused to give it because they are against homosexual relationships because it turned out their father was gay.
Offline
You have a good point, it may not even be an authentic letter since a pseudonym was used and the college was not listed. It could be written by someone who is pro 2nd amendment to rally support, there is definitely that possibility.
I would truly hope someone wouldn't refuse a letter of recommendation just based on the other person's view of guns (or other beliefs). While the professor thinks going to a shooting range and applying for a concealed carry permit is disturbing, that is something normal to millions of people and well within their rights and societal norms.
It should go without saying that I would have the same view if the roles in this were reversed and the professor was the "gun enthusiast" and the student opposed guns.