Offline
I'm going to say, yes they can.
Voters don't pick nominee, we do: GOP official
Political parties, not voters, choose their presidential nominees, a Republican convention rules member told CNBC, a day after GOP front-runner Donald Trump rolled up more big primary victories.
"The media has created the perception that the voters choose the nomination. That's the conflict here," Curly Haugland, an unbound GOP delegate from North Dakota, told CNBC's " Squawk Box " on Wednesday. He even questioned why primaries are held.
There are 112 Republican delegates who are not required to cast their support for any one candidate, because their states and territories don't hold primaries or caucuses.
Even with Trump 's huge projected delegate haul in four state primaries on Tuesday, the odds are increasing the billionaire businessman may not ultimately get the 1,237 delegates needed by the convention to claim the GOP nomination.
This could lead to a brokered convention, in which unbound delegates, like Haugland, could play a significant swing role on the first ballot to choose a nominee.
Most delegates bound by their state's primary or caucus results are only committed on the first ballot. If subsequent ballots are needed, most of the delegates can vote any way they want, said Gary Emineth, another unbound delegate from North Dakota.
Democrats experienced the latest true brokered presidential convention to go beyond the first ballot in 1952. Republicans came close at their 1976 convention.
"The rules haven't kept up," Haugland said. "The rules are still designed to have a political party choose its nominee at a convention. That's just the way it is. I can't help it. Don't hate me because I love the rules."
Haugland said he sent a letter to each campaign alerting them to a rule change he's proposing, which would allow any candidate who earns at least one delegate during the nominating process to submit his or her name to be nominated at this summer's convention.
If the GOP race continues at the same pace, Trump would likely have a plurality of delegates. So far, he's more than halfway to the 1,237 magic number.
Trump split Tuesday's winner-take-all primaries in Florida and Ohio.
The real estate mogul dominated in Florida over Sen. Marco Rubio , who dropped out of the race after losing his home state.
But Trump lost Ohio to the state's governor, John Kasich . Trump also won Illinois and North Carolina. He held a slim lead over Texas Sen. Ted Cruz in Missouri early Wednesday.
Emineth, also a former chairman of the North Dakota Republican Party, told "Squawk Box" in the same interview he's concerned about party officials pulling "some shenanigan."
"You have groups of people who are going to try to take over the rules committee," he warned. "[That] could totally change everything, and mess things up with the delegates. And people across the country will be very frustrated."
Emineth said he's worried that such frustration would discourage Americans in the general election from voting Republican.
Offline
This is sad. As much as I, or someone else, might not like a particular candidate, you have to let democracy run its course by letting the voters have their voice. This completely undermines everything people say about voting being important. When pessimists say that their vote doesn't count, so why bother, it's hard to argue with them when things like this are pointed out.
Offline
It well could be as the saying goes "You ain't seen nothin' yet !"
Offline
It hasn't been until the last 50 years that voters selected their party nominees, before that it was "party elders" who picked their nominees. Technically, we don't have the right to elect party candidates.
Offline
Brady Bunch wrote:
It hasn't been until the last 50 years that voters selected their party nominees, before that it was "party elders" who picked their nominees. Technically, we don't have the right to elect party candidates.
I believe it traces back to about 1916 when about half the states drafted Presidential Primary laws.
Offline
I know they existed longer than the last 50 years, but my point was the convention still played a huge role and candidates were really decided at the convention. It hasn't been until the last 50 years or so where the voters are really picking the party nominee
Offline
Well, why not simply do away with the conventions and let the 'party elders' choose who will carry the team's flag into battle? As Brady suggests, tribal members don't have any legitimate right in the process anyway. Maybe the party mucky-mucks feel it's a way to make the followers feel like they really belong to something.
Offline
Just Fred wrote:
Well, why not simply do away with the conventions and let the 'party elders' choose who will carry the team's flag into battle? As Brady suggests, tribal members don't have any legitimate right in the process anyway. Maybe the party mucky-mucks feel it's a way to make the followers feel like they really belong to something.
I have a feeling with the way things are operating in Washington, the way information is now shared over the internet and the way campaigns and fundraising seem to be evolving that it will only be a matter of time before we start to get independent candidates for President who have a chance to be elected.
Offline
Trump is predicting riots if he's not the R nominee. Threats? Dumpf's way of assuring he's the one?
Offline
flowergirl wrote:
Trump is predicting riots if he's not the R nominee. Threats? Dumpf's way of assuring he's the one?
Riots? I highly doubt it. But, if the leading vote-getter, whoever it is, doesn't get the nomination, especially if they won by a large margin, I do think there would be a lot of outrage. It wouldn't be a good thing for the party, for sure.