Offline
A Little Reality on Immigration
David Brooks
FEB. 19, 2016
Donald Trump built his campaign on the promise to build a wall along the Mexican border. The idea is attention-grabbing (and unworkable). But the striking thing is that it’s not too far away from the current Republican orthodoxy.
Not long ago you could be a movement conservative and be for reasonably open immigration policies. Ronald Reagan, Jack Kemp, Steve Forbes and George W. Bush all took open positions on immigration.
But times have changed. Now you prove your conservative credentials by saying you want to deport undocumented aliens. Now you prove it by opposing higher immigration flows. Now Donald Trump brings Republican crowds to their feet by bashing the supposed criminal hordes sneaking up from Mexico.
The problem with this new orthodoxy is that it is completely obsolete. It’s based on a view of immigration that may have reflected 1980s realities, but that has little to do with reality today.
The number of illegal immigrants flowing into this country is dropping, not rising. The flow of total immigrants peaked in 2005 and has been dropping since. The share of immigrants coming from Latin America is falling sharply. Since 2008, more immigrants have come from Asia than Latin America, and the disparity is growing.
There are more Mexicans leaving the United States than coming in. According to the Pew Research Center, there was a net outflow of 140,000 from 2009 to 2014. If Trump builds his wall, he’ll lock more Mexican immigrants in than he’ll keep out.
Trump plays up the alleged threat of crime committed by immigrants. But the overall evidence is clear. Immigrants make American streets safer. Roughly 1.6 percent of immigrant males between ages 18 and 39 wind up incarcerated, compared with 3.3 percent of native-born American men of the same age. Among native-born men without a high school diploma, about 11 percent are incarcerated. Among similarly educated Mexican, Guatemalan and Salvadoran men here, only 2 or 3 percent get incarcerated.
One study of 103 cities between 1994 and 2004 found that violent crime rates decreased as the concentration of immigrants increased. Numerous studies have shown that a big share of the drop in crime rates in the 1990s is a result of the surge in immigration.
Trump plays up the threat of terrorism. But the real threat is that our border agencies spend so much time tracking down people who want to be gardeners that they don’t have the resources to track down the people who want to be suicide bombers. Fighting terrorism by going after the whole swath of immigration policy is like fighting germs with a sledgehammer.
There’s a reason Republicans from Reagan to Bush supported reasonably open immigration policies. They are and have always been good for America.
A new summary of the research from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine found that immigrants are integrating into society as well as ever. The bulk of the evidence shows that immigrants have a hugely positive effect on total American G.D.P. while having little effect on overall wages. The surge in Asian immigration will bring a gigantic number of highly skilled people, who end up with higher education levels than the American average, higher productivity levels and higher incomes.
So why is the Trump message selling? Well, economic growth has been slow and wages have been stagnant (mostly because technology is displacing workers). Government is dysfunctional and the immigration issue has become a symbol for how elites are out of touch with the mainstream.
But mostly it’s the clash of two trends: the graying of the G.O.P. and the browning of America. The Republican primary base is more and more made up of older people, who have significantly more negative views about immigration. Second, by 2044, America will be a majority-minority country. This is a very different America than the one people who grew up in the 1960s were used to. It’s a historical transformation that is bound to raise very legitimate concerns.
The way for Republicans to address these concerns, though, is not to build a wall and treat immigrants as suspicious alien invaders. It’s to work on our legal immigration system — make the system ample and streamlined enough so that most people come here in the right way, in a way they can be vetted.
Admit more skilled immigrants and fewer unskilled ones. This would be a giant boon to the economy over all. It would make our immigration policies less geared to serving the elites — giving them ample supplies of nannies and nail polishers. Reducing the supply of unskilled immigrants may do something to raise the wages of unskilled natives and ease their legitimate concerns.
Donald Trump’s G.O.P. is a rear-window party pining for a white America that is never coming back. Ronald Reagan’s G.O.P., and maybe some future G.O.P., will fix the immigration system and attract the people who will make the country innovative, dynamic and interesting for decades to come.
Offline
There are more Mexicans leaving the United States than coming in. According to the Pew Research Center, there was a net outflow of 140,000 from 2009 to 2014. If Trump builds his wall, he’ll lock more Mexican immigrants in than he’ll keep out.
That point has been made before, but some people simply aren't paying attention.
Another fact is that of the 11 million immigrants currently in the USA, 8 million of them are employed. Well, who is hiring them? I mean most immigrants that have crossed the border did it to find employment, and somebody is hiring them. If you want to address the immigration issue, how 'bout we start by clamping down on people and businesses that hire them.
Offline
"Well, who is hiring them? I mean most immigrants that have crossed the border did it to find employment, and somebody is hiring them.". Just Fred
Who is hiring them . . . Trump enterprises as waiters, kitchen staff, cleaning staff, grounds keeping, maintenance, etc. Also an occasional nanny, cleaning and grounds keeping people by one of your senators, congressmen, or governor.
You are exactly right Fred. Immigrants come for jobs. If employers are abiding by the law, undocumented workers would be identified in the hiring process. Many employers overlook those rules, and hire undocumented workers as casual or full time employees at a reduced payroll rate.
It's kind of like the 'war on drugs' that we've been fighting (and losing) for my entire lifetime. We concentrate on and blame the evil doers in other countries that supply the product and completely ignore the demand that exists in our country that ensures a continuing stream of product crossing our borders.
Offline
While testifying before the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, Border Patrol agent Chris Cabrera indicated that nearly 6 out of 10 illegal aliens cross into the United States without being apprehended.
Cabrera is an agent at the Rio Grande Valley Sector in Texas and is the vice president of National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) Local 3307, a union for border agents.“Ask any line Agent in the field and he or she will tell you that at best we apprehend 35-40% of the illegal immigrants attempting to cross," Cabrera said, reading from a written testimony. "This number is even lower for drug smugglers who are much more adept at eluding capture."
Cabrera went on to testify that that his fellow agents “face retribution” from their superiors for reporting illegal alien groups larger than 20.“Agents who repeatedly report groups larger than 20 face retribution. Management will either take them out of the field and assign them to processing detainees at the station or assign them to a fixed position in low volume areas as punishment,” Cabrera told lawmakers. “Needless to say Agents got the message and now stay below this 20 person threshold no matter the actual size of the group.”Cabrera also noted that the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency, a component of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), is manipulating statistics and misleading the American people about security along the U.S.-Mexico border.“I want to address whether or not the border is secure.
If you ask this question of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) or senior management at Customs and Border Protection (CBP), they will tell you the border is secure,” the Border Patrol agent told lawmakers. “They may even point to statistics and metrics showing that the Border Patrol is 75 percent effective in apprehending illegal immigrants and drug smugglers.”However, he also said, “I want to be crystal clear – the border is not secure,” later adding, “How can this enormous gap exist between what the DHS tells you here in Washington and what our Agents know to be the truth in the field? Frankly, it is how you manipulate the statistics.”Cabrera concluded his testimony stating that Border Patrol Chief Michael Fisher is wrong in claiming that border agents are “75 percent effective and the border is secure” and calling for more resources for Border Patrol agents.
Last edited by Common Sense (2/19/2016 9:13 am)
Offline
Given the Data that Brooks presents, why is this such a hot button issue with the base?
Offline
I understand the information in your post, Common, but how should we address the fact many of these people are looking for employment and somebody is hiring them. I think there are plenty of business owners are just fine with the status quo for the reasons rongone posted.
Last edited by Just Fred (2/19/2016 9:35 am)
Offline
The border is a political issue only.
As noted, there is a next minus in terms of illegals in/out. Those coming just because of lack of work opportunities in their native Mexico are now returning.
IF we are worried about terrorists sneaking across our borders, then perhaps we ALSO need to build a wall across the Canadian border - AND we could make CANADA PAY FOR IT !
Wile our borders will likely forever be somewhat porous, the notion of illegals staying here requires that they find work AND that CAN BE SOLVED. I might note that some businesses do not want it to be solved.
Offline
tennyson wrote:
The border is a political issue only.
As noted, there is a next minus in terms of illegals in/out. Those coming just because of lack of work opportunities in their native Mexico are now returning.
IF we are worried about terrorists sneaking across our borders, then perhaps we ALSO need to build a wall across the Canadian border - AND we could make CANADA PAY FOR IT !
Wile our borders will likely forever be somewhat porous, the notion of illegals staying here requires that they find work AND that CAN BE SOLVED. I might note that some businesses do not want it to be solved.
No I would disagree that it is just a political issue. Ask the people along the border in California, Arizona, Texas.
Who are under siege because of the illegal activity that takes place every day at the border. There is no minus in term of illegal aliens entering the country. There are legal methods to come into the country. They need to be followed and our laws enforced!
Offline
Just Fred wrote:
I understand the information in your post, Common, but how should we address the fact many of these people are looking for employment and somebody is hiring them. I think there are plenty of business owners are just fine with the status quo for the reasons rongone posted.
E-verify
U.S. law requires companies to employ only individuals who may legally work in the United States – either U.S. citizens, or foreign citizens who have the necessary authorization. This diverse workforce contributes greatly to the vibrancy and strength of our economy, but that same strength also attracts unauthorized employment.E-Verify is an Internet-based system that allows businesses to determine the eligibility of their employees to work in the United States. E-Verify is fast, free and easy to use – and it’s the best way employers can ensure a legal workforce.
You are correct many want things left as they are. Cheap labor! They are violating the law when they hire illegal alien and should be prosecuted to the full extend of the law.
Offline
You are correct many want things left as they are. Cheap labor! They are violating the law when they hire illegal alien and should be prosecuted to the full extend of the law. - Common
I'm with you on that to the point I think THAT should be the very first thing we do. It might save alot of fussing and investing money for building walls and militarizing our borders with more an more border guards.