Offline
Ted Cruz, as with most politicians, thinks he is adept at avoiding actually answering questions. Here's an example of his doublespeak avoidance when asked a simple question about what he will replace the ACA with:
Uncomfortable Question for Ted Cruz on Obamacare Silences the Room
1:51 pm ET
By Matt Flegenheimer
HUBBARD, Iowa — Senator Ted Cruz is often asked about doing away with President Obama’s health care law. He is less rarely pressed by voters on what will replace it.
But at a middle school cafeteria here, a man, Mike Valde, presented him with a tragic tale. His brother-in-law Mark was a barber — “a small-business man,” he said. He had never had a paid vacation day. He received health insurance at last because of the Affordable Care Act. He began to feel sick and went to a doctor.
“He had never been to a doctor for years,” Mr. Valde, 63, of Coralville, Iowa, said. “Multiple tumors behind his heart, his liver, his pancreas. And they said, ‘We’re sorry, sir, there’s nothing we can do for you.’ ”
The room was silent.
“Mark never had health care until Obama care,” Mr. Valde continued. “What are you going to replace it with?”
Mr. Cruz expressed condolences and pivoted quickly to a well-worn answer assailing the health care law.
Mr. Cruz said “millions of Americans” had lost their jobs and their doctors as a result of the law, and that many had “seen their premiums skyrocket.”
He said he had often joked about a pledge by Mr. Obama that premiums would drop: “Anyone whose premiums have dropped $2,500, as President Obama promised, should vote for Hillary Clinton,” Mr. Cruz said. “I’ll take everybody else.”
Many in the room laughed.
Mr. Valde — who said in an interview later that he did in fact intend to caucus for Mrs. Clinton — pressed on.
“My question is, what are you going to replace it with?” he said.
Mr. Cruz said he was getting there, but had to lay out the problems with the law first. “There are millions of stories on the other side,” he said, describing voters who had liked their insurance plans and lost them because the plans did not provide the level of coverage the new law required.
He went on to describe elements of his plan, which includes an effort to allow people to purchase insurance across state lines.
Mr. Cruz turned back to Mr. Valde. “Your father-in-law, he couldn’t afford it,” he said.
“Brother-in-law,” Mr. Valde said.
“Your brother-in-law couldn’t afford it,” Mr. Cruz said.
“Right,” Mr. Valde said. “But he could afford it — he finally got it under Obama.”
“He would have gotten it earlier, if he could have afforded it earlier,” Mr. Cruz said. “But because of government regulations he couldn’t.”
Moments later, Mr. Cruz wrapped up and Mr. Valde sat down.
Thanks TrusTED. That's just what Mr. Valde was looking for . . . A clear, concise answer to a simple question.
Offline
Wonderful, but sad, example of how all these politicians avoid direct responses on issues important to the electorate. My heart goes out to Mr. Valde and all the others who are looking for answers but do not get them.
Offline
All the news services are running this. Well, you probably won't see it on Legalinsurrection.com.
You can get pretty far hating Obama and trashing the ACA.
But, Ted, you have nothing better to offer.
Offline
Legalinsurrection.com seems to be extremely troubling for some on the Exchange!
Some that probably don't want any information but praise for the current administration.
And if you don't praise them then you must hate them........... Destroy the messenger!
Never mind the terrible message.
Offline
Not sure what you are talking about there. When it comes to sources and/or opinions on an issue it's best to run a 'Fact Check' first before coming to a conclusion.
Offline
Common Sense wrote:
Legalinsurrection.com seems to be extremely troubling for some on the Exchange!
Some that probably don't want any information but praise for the current administration.
And if you don't praise them then you must hate them........... Destroy the messenger!
Never mind the terrible message.
Please try to calm down.
Legal insurrection can take a little criticism.
No one is censuring them, just criticizing them.
No need to freak out