The New Exchange

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

10/31/2015 3:12 pm  #1

Arbitration Everywhere, Stacking the Deck of Justice

Arbitration Everywhere,
Stacking the Deck of Justice

OCT. 31, 2015

On Page 5 of a credit card contract used by American Express, beneath an explainer on interest rates and late fees, past the details about annual membership, is a clause that most customers probably miss. If cardholders have a problem with their account, American Express explains, the company “may elect to resolve any claim by individual arbitration.”

Those nine words are at the center of a far-reaching power play orchestrated by American corporations, an investigation by The New York Times has found.

By inserting individual arbitration clauses into a soaring number of consumer and employment contracts, companies like American Express devised a way to circumvent the courts and bar people from joining together in class-action lawsuits, realistically the only tool citizens have to fight illegal or deceitful business practices.

Over the last few years, it has become increasingly difficult to apply for a credit card, use a cellphone, get cable or Internet service, or shop online without agreeing to private arbitration. The same applies to getting a job, renting a car or placing a relative in a nursing home.

Beware the Fine Print
This is the first part in a series examining how clauses buried in tens of millions of contracts have deprived Americans of one of their most fundamental constitutional rights: their day in court.
Among the class actions thrown out because of the clauses was one brought by Time Warner customers over charges they said mysteriously appeared on their bills and another against a travel booking website accused of conspiring to fix hotel prices. A top executive at Goldman Sachs who sued on behalf of bankers claiming sex discrimination was also blocked, as were African-American employees at Taco Bell restaurants who said they were denied promotions, forced to work the worst shifts and subjected to degrading comments.

Some state judges have called the class-action bans a “get out of jail free” card, because it is nearly impossible for one individual to take on a corporation with vast resources.

Patricia Rowe of Greenville, S.C., learned this firsthand when she initiated a class action against AT&T. Ms. Rowe, who was challenging a $600 fee for canceling her phone service, was among more than 900 AT&T customers in three states who complained about excessive charges, state records show. When the case was thrown out last year, she was forced to give up and pay the $600. Fighting AT&T on her own in arbitration, she said, would have cost far more.

By banning class actions, companies have essentially disabled consumer challenges to practices like predatory lending, wage theft and discrimination, court records show.

“This is among the most profound shifts in our legal history,” William G. Young, a federal judge in Boston who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan, said in an interview. “Ominously, business has a good chance of opting out of the legal system altogether and misbehaving without reproach.”

Continued at:

We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 

10/31/2015 4:08 pm  #2

Re: Arbitration Everywhere, Stacking the Deck of Justice

warning . . . Sarcasm font

Corporations only do this sort of thing to protect their profits by denying frivolous law suits initiated by greedy customers who are unduly influenced by unscrupulous lawyers. These co-conspirators (customers and lawyers) are opposed to free enterprise and the proven equity of the capitalist economic system. By filing class action lawsuits against corporation they attempt to twist the rules and tenets of unreasonable contractual obligations that favor the customer and prevent the corporation from fulfilling its promise to its shareholders. Also, the people that file these lawsuits, are not aware of the fact that, if the corporation did not protect itself by creating these contractual loopholes, the company would not be able to continue to hire more people that results in higher overall employment and a boost to the overall economy of the country. So, a reasonable person can only conclude that contractual arbitration clauses are good for the country, and people that try to circumvent them by filing class action lawsuits against corporations are nothing more than lazy opportunists trying to take advantage of the system. They are merely another permutation of our welfare society.


Board footera


Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum