The New Exchange

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



8/19/2015 12:13 pm  #1


Loyalty Oaths?

WTF? Has Nebraska been overrun with Russian spies posing as teachers?
Thank goodness for the ACLU..





http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/08/19/aclu-objects-to-nebraska-school-district-asking-teachers-to-sign-pro-america/?intcmp=hplnws

ACLU objects to Nebraska school district asking teachers to sign pro-America pledge

Published August 19, 2015
FoxNews.com

A Nebraska school district is facing complaints from the American Civil Liberties Union for following a state law requiring teachers to sign a pro-America pledge. 

The Lincoln Journal Star reports that Hastings Public Schools, in southern Nebraska, has only recently started following the 1951, Cold War-era law. 

Superintendent Craig Kautz told the newspaper he started asking teachers to sign the pledge this year, following legal advice. 

"So, for the first time in my working career we basically asked our staff to do that -- our teaching staff -- the minimum required by statute," he said. 

Those signing it effectively pledge that they believe in the U.S. government and will teach "love and devotion" for the country. 

But Amy Miller, with the ACLU of Nebraska, reportedly argued that under Supreme Court rulings, public employees cannot be required to sign these pledges, calling them unconstitutional. 

"You need to know that the statute is a dead letter law which has been clearly overruled by the highest court in the land. Attempting to enforce the state statue is unconstitutional and will expose the school district to liability to a civil rights lawsuit," the ACLU wrote in a letter to the school district, the Journal Star reports. 

The ACLU wants the district to make clear within seven days teachers don't have to sign the pledge. 

Kautz, while defending the pledge request, clarified that there is technically no penalty for not signing. 

Other major public school systems in Nebraska do not ask teachers to sign the document.


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
 

8/19/2015 1:31 pm  #2


Re: Loyalty Oaths?

"Superintendent Craig Kautz told the newspaper he started asking teachers to sign the pledge this year, following legal advice."


Maybe Mr. Kautz should have asked for a second legal opinion.

 

8/19/2015 2:29 pm  #3


Re: Loyalty Oaths?

Or get a better qualified lawyer who is not practicing Cold War antiquties.

Last edited by flowergirl (8/19/2015 9:13 pm)

 

8/19/2015 3:02 pm  #4


Re: Loyalty Oaths?

There is a group of idiots in the comment section on the Fox site supporting mandatory  loyalty oaths to the US for all Americans.

One of them uses a confederate flag as an avatar.

You can't make this sh#t up. 


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
     Thread Starter
 

8/19/2015 7:35 pm  #5


Re: Loyalty Oaths?

You know, (and maybe this could be a topic starter for another thread) but I'm beginning to wonder if we, as an entire nation, are intelligent enough to function as a democratic society.  I really am.  

 

8/19/2015 7:50 pm  #6


Re: Loyalty Oaths?

Loyalty oaths could be problematic for "Oathkeepers" and other anti-gov types.


Life is an Orthros.
 

8/19/2015 8:26 pm  #7


Re: Loyalty Oaths?

Just Fred wrote:

You know, (and maybe this could be a topic starter for another thread) but I'm beginning to wonder if we, as an entire nation, are intelligent enough to function as a democratic society.  I really am.  

 
Intelligence isn't a requirement for a democratic society, it never has been and never will be.  If it were, there would be knowledge tests in order to be allowed to vote.  While I wouldn't be against that, that's not how this country is, ever was, or ever will be.  It would be easier just to move to a country that doesn't allow its people to vote if you want to escape living in a democratic society.

 

8/20/2015 5:09 am  #8


Re: Loyalty Oaths?

The Man wrote:

Just Fred wrote:

You know, (and maybe this could be a topic starter for another thread) but I'm beginning to wonder if we, as an entire nation, are intelligent enough to function as a democratic society.  I really am.  

 
Intelligence isn't a requirement for a democratic society, it never has been and never will be. If it were, there would be knowledge tests in order to be allowed to vote. While I wouldn't be against that, that's not how this country is, ever was, or ever will be. It would be easier just to move to a country that doesn't allow its people to vote if you want to escape living in a democratic society.

I don't see anywhere that Fred said that we should sort people into piles of those deserving to vote and those that the world would be better off without. Others do that, but not Fred.

I think that Fred is wondering if this nation, with its collective ignorance of issues, its binary worldview of us v them - where them is anybody who is a progressive -  where one side deludes inself into thinking it has a monopoly on patriotism, can still address the problems that it faces. The debt, national defense, income inequity, air and water quality , etc.
It's a good question. When I look out and see a nation that addresses problems with nothing any deeper than  labels and glib one-liners, and see a circus clown leading the GOP polls,,,, well, it's a damn good question.


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
     Thread Starter
 

8/20/2015 5:10 am  #9


Re: Loyalty Oaths?

Tarnation wrote:

Loyalty oaths could be problematic for "Oathkeepers" and other anti-gov types.

I wonder if they would appreciate the irony.


We live in a time in which decent and otherwise sensible people are surrendering too easily to the hectoring of morons or extremists. 
     Thread Starter
 

8/20/2015 6:51 am  #10


Re: Loyalty Oaths?

Man, perhaps I should have used the word 'educated' instead of 'intelligent'.  Democracy is a great experiment in governance, but it requires an educated populace or it won't work.

You can't simply say you are going to organize a form of government 'of, by, and for the people' without emphasizing the reponsibility of running such a system with an educated and informed citizenry.

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum